| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 建築研究所 === 104 === This thesis is focused on the experience of time in architecture. It explores the situations and transformations of various spaces and rooms change with time. The appearance of the combined panorama is included as well.
Chapter One, Movie Narration, reveals through the interactions between films and architecture, what the consequence of space states created by the only means of time would be. The following discussion is the continuity and fragments of architecture. Chapter Two studies the case of Carlo Scarpa: Museo Gipsoteca Antonio Canova Addition (1955-57), learning to integrate all of the fragments into a complete unity. It is the light that roams thoroughly inside the architecture creating the integrated context of it. The light continues the management of partial perception in the time experience.
In the continuing three chapters, different types of narration themes are inserted into the time passage separately. The partial scenes are, therefore, integrated into a panorama; consequently, the overall context of each time experience emerges. Chapter Three, the Photograph Museum, interprets that the architecture space experiences arouse individual’s awareness of entire urban image. As a result, partial architecture narrations are integrated into a unity with the external urban context. Chapter Four, Opening Museum, while viewing the photographic works, visitors soak up an atmosphere by getting aware of the context in space shaping. It’s not only a conscious awareness, but constructing another space in imagination. Chapter Five reveals the situation of disorderliness in Sugiura Kohei’s art works rooted in his profound cultural background by examining his performance in this category. The panorama in his art works exists in viewers’ reading process. The net among various fragments keeps transforming during the progress of conscious chasing. The panorama continues solidly but invisibly.
The Last Chapter informs that self-sufficient cities and residences are manipulated by all the means of design discussed previously. Citizens’ life equals to the periods of manipulation; statements are the equivalent of randomly changing communities themselves. Tales of the environment and its surroundings stir up the abundant contexts to melt fragments of the architecture into different sites. Eventually, the panorama of statements get apart from the architecture itself moving to other objects, and even spreading outwards indistinctively. It exists anytime anywhere, changing constantly in the movement of locals and the urban boroughs.
While time is leading the shifts of locals’ consciousness, partial statements are weaving into an entire unity.
|
|---|
