The Influence of Leadership Style and Self-Efficacy on Organizational Affective Commitment –An Intervening Test for Organizational Innovative Culture

碩士 === 健行科技大學 === 國際企業經營系碩士在職專班 === 104 === Humans are social animals, and all of their activities are almost confined to the society. Man, machine, material, measurement, and method are the five elements for manufacturing process management. Among them, human management is the most critical section...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng-Wei Chang, 張成瑋
Other Authors: 莊育詩
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/wtsh9f
Description
Summary:碩士 === 健行科技大學 === 國際企業經營系碩士在職專班 === 104 === Humans are social animals, and all of their activities are almost confined to the society. Man, machine, material, measurement, and method are the five elements for manufacturing process management. Among them, human management is the most critical section in the industry. Even if a company has the best equipment, sufficient supply of raw materials, and standard operation procedure, all efforts will be in vain if no personnel can do implementation. This study is aimed at the grass-roots workers in electronic equipment manufacturing industry. A total of 250 questionnaires were sent out and 222 of them were returned with 8 invalid. There were 214 valid questionnaires, with validity rate of 85.6%. Hypothesis test and intervening test analyses were carried out with structural equation modeling (SEM). The results show that leadership style has a significant influenceon affective commitment to the organization, leadership style has a mediating effect on the innovation culture in organizational affective commitment, employees’ self-efficacy has a full mediating effect on the innovation culture in organizational affective commitment, and employees’ self-efficacy has an insignificant influence on affective commitment to the organization. The results also show thatthe level of employees’ commitment to their organization not only is affected by the superintendent’s leadership style, but also will indirectly affect the organization affective commitment because the employees, driven by their own self-efficacy, tend to select innovative culture. Therefore, an enterprise should both value its leadership style and examine its culture to see if it keeps up with the times. Only with constant innovation willan enterprise retain talent and achieve sustainable development.