A Study of Illegal Use of Farmland in Tainan

碩士 === 長榮大學 === 土地管理與開發學系(所) === 104 === The Agricultural Development Act amended in 2000 made significant changes in agricultural policy. It changed from『farmland owned by farmer and farmland used exclusively for agriculture』policy to『relaxation of farmland owned by farmer and improve implementatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen-Fen Done, 董章芬
Other Authors: Jia- Ci Zhang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/yum25p
Description
Summary:碩士 === 長榮大學 === 土地管理與開發學系(所) === 104 === The Agricultural Development Act amended in 2000 made significant changes in agricultural policy. It changed from『farmland owned by farmer and farmland used exclusively for agriculture』policy to『relaxation of farmland owned by farmer and improve implementation of farmland used exclusively for agriculture』policy. According to Art.8.1(3) of Agricultural Development Act, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan enacted Regulation for approval of agriculture facilities on farmland(hereinafter referred to as application for agriculture facilities).It specified farmland applicable category 、agriculture facilities types、application forms and data attached、facilities building coverage ratio、operating procedures、…and so on, to be farmland administrative basis. Although the Regulation experienced 5 times amendments through 2003 to 2015. It was revised in the direction of 「Fitting into new industrial concept and practice、allowing multivariate use of marginal farmland」、「simplifying review items, conforming to facilitate administration for people’s convenience」and 「strengthening inspection and administration of agriculture facilities」. However irregular use of farmland had been a countrywide issue. New purchase farmland personal owner took advantage of the Regulation to apply for agriculture facilities approval just wanting irregular use. This problem had spread all over the country and consequent irregular use ratio had reached 80 percent. The major cause was short of strict legislation of the Regulation as we knew﹒ This study result demonstrated that the only way of correcting irregular use of farmland is tracking blacklist 、 continuing cumulative penalty 、 setting higher threshold for applicants and consequently making violation penalty greater than violation reward to stop irregular use of farmland. Then approached all nations’ best benefit of farmland used for agriculture。