| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 哲學系研究所 === 104 === This paper aims to explore the theoretical FSE substance Intemann (2010,2015) proposed to explain Intemann (2010,2015) has a view of the position of feminist theory and empirical theory of two high similarity, there are common research goals , so merging two theories become FSE theory. F.S.E. theory can stand on while addressing the "obvious and trivial really wrong" and "value paradox" between the two problems, we can solve feminist empiricism, "scientific diversity of sources" and "consistent value" two problems. Not only solve the problem of feminist standpoint theory and empirical theory of their own, but also adds new benefits and approach to feminist epistemology and feminist science.
Section of this paper planning is as follows: The first chapter describes the first Feminist Theory of the origin and development of knowledge. The second chapter monograph Theoretical connotation position on (Feminist Standpoint) and feminist empiricism (Feminist Empiricism), as well as the theoretical development. The third chapter focuses on the theory and feminist stance empirical perception of objectivity. The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis Intemann (2010,2015) and the position on feminist empiricism F.S.E. merger of merger
In summary, this paper support F.S.E., the following main reasons: First, the position of theory and feminist theory empiricism each puzzle can be solved. Second, the research orientation F.S.E. It has the advantage of knowledge, can produce good scientific results in the future. The last reference Hovorka (2015) describes the interleaving of pluralism (intersectionality), drill (performativity) and position on the (standpoint) and other scientific research to introduce three FSE useful for science, and at the end the hope for a feminist epistemology, women Marxist science and other aspects can contribute.
|
|---|
