Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan

碩士 === 國立雲林科技大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 103 === During the U.S. patent infringement lawsuit, it is the validity of the patent that alleged infringers defend the most frequently. Due to the lengthiness of the lawsuit in the U.S., as well as the high cost of the lawsuit, it takes a long time to determine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LI,Yan-Min, 李彥旻
Other Authors: Yang, Chih-Chieh
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/mgv385
id ndltd-TW-103YUNT0705020
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-103YUNT07050202019-05-15T22:08:03Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/mgv385 Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan 美國專利領證後複審制度之研究 -兼論臺灣之專利舉發制度 LI,Yan-Min 李彥旻 碩士 國立雲林科技大學 科技法律研究所 103 During the U.S. patent infringement lawsuit, it is the validity of the patent that alleged infringers defend the most frequently. Due to the lengthiness of the lawsuit in the U.S., as well as the high cost of the lawsuit, it takes a long time to determine the validity of the patent. Hence, the early U.S. Congress created the process of patent reexamination process, so as to solve the controversy of the validity of the patent. The validity of the patent can be determined more rapidly in the patent reexamination process than at the patent litigation, but it still takes two to three years. On September 16, 2011, therefore, the America Invents Act was passed by the U.S. Congress, creating three patent licensing review procedures, so that the validity of the patent could be determined efficiently. However, are there any differences between the three new review procedures and the unilateral reexamination procedure in the aspects of the operation mode and their procedures? Are there any impacts between the validity of the patent determined by the court and the reexamination decision made by Patent Trial and Appeal Board on each other’s procedure? Even, during the patent infringement litigation, what is the court’s opinion about alleged infringers’ request that the court stop the litigation proceeding to wait for the outcome of patent reexamination? In this study, the legislative evolution of America Invents Act and the three new administrative procedures for challenging the validity of the patent were first introduced and analyzed. Then, the three patent licensing review procedures and Taiwanese patent invalidation were compared, and several conclusions were also proposed. It is hoped that this study can help future researchers to investigate this issue. Yang, Chih-Chieh 楊智傑 2015 學位論文 ; thesis 78 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立雲林科技大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 103 === During the U.S. patent infringement lawsuit, it is the validity of the patent that alleged infringers defend the most frequently. Due to the lengthiness of the lawsuit in the U.S., as well as the high cost of the lawsuit, it takes a long time to determine the validity of the patent. Hence, the early U.S. Congress created the process of patent reexamination process, so as to solve the controversy of the validity of the patent. The validity of the patent can be determined more rapidly in the patent reexamination process than at the patent litigation, but it still takes two to three years. On September 16, 2011, therefore, the America Invents Act was passed by the U.S. Congress, creating three patent licensing review procedures, so that the validity of the patent could be determined efficiently. However, are there any differences between the three new review procedures and the unilateral reexamination procedure in the aspects of the operation mode and their procedures? Are there any impacts between the validity of the patent determined by the court and the reexamination decision made by Patent Trial and Appeal Board on each other’s procedure? Even, during the patent infringement litigation, what is the court’s opinion about alleged infringers’ request that the court stop the litigation proceeding to wait for the outcome of patent reexamination? In this study, the legislative evolution of America Invents Act and the three new administrative procedures for challenging the validity of the patent were first introduced and analyzed. Then, the three patent licensing review procedures and Taiwanese patent invalidation were compared, and several conclusions were also proposed. It is hoped that this study can help future researchers to investigate this issue.
author2 Yang, Chih-Chieh
author_facet Yang, Chih-Chieh
LI,Yan-Min
李彥旻
author LI,Yan-Min
李彥旻
spellingShingle LI,Yan-Min
李彥旻
Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan
author_sort LI,Yan-Min
title Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan
title_short Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan
title_full Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan
title_fullStr Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Patent Post Issuance Review in U.S.: Compare with Patent Invalidation System in Taiwan
title_sort patent post issuance review in u.s.: compare with patent invalidation system in taiwan
publishDate 2015
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/mgv385
work_keys_str_mv AT liyanmin patentpostissuancereviewinuscomparewithpatentinvalidationsystemintaiwan
AT lǐyànmín patentpostissuancereviewinuscomparewithpatentinvalidationsystemintaiwan
AT liyanmin měiguózhuānlìlǐngzhènghòufùshěnzhìdùzhīyánjiūjiānlùntáiwānzhīzhuānlìjǔfāzhìdù
AT lǐyànmín měiguózhuānlìlǐngzhènghòufùshěnzhìdùzhīyánjiūjiānlùntáiwānzhīzhuānlìjǔfāzhìdù
_version_ 1719125354303455232