| Summary: | 碩士 === 樹德科技大學 === 建築與室內設計研究所 === 103 === “Rural Regeneration” is promoted by the Taiwan government in recent years, a major policy of local governance. In the Community Building is the most organized, the structure is the most complete policy, a guided policy action plan. Then, when the government promote policies, if it can exert an great effect? It is often a confusing question. This is not only an ordeal, but also relate to every resident who live in the community. After setting Rural regeneration Ordinance, through the conversion about this setting, the supporting the implementation of the program and cross-border nature of public affairs, the concept of “Community” has been given the continuing evolution of meaning constantly. This study join Rural Regeneration Incubation Projection from 2012. Observe the evolution of Taiwan rural regeneration, then proposed “Taiwan rural regeneration evolutionary phenomenon.”
Enlightment of community awareness, from the individual to the group, is the need for sufficient time to put into action through a learning organization(learning organization) way to be able to play a benefit. Investment in rural community organizations and community influence and transform present study was to investigate the way the literature and case studies of, for the “earth trench”,“ Shan”, “Xing”, “Zi Ping” “reunification ridge”, “Wen Xian” and six other communities, as the “regeneration plan”, “Community’s” four facets, examine the evolution of the phenomenon of regeneration of rural Taiwan.
Rural Regeneration municipal government, community and team effort over 13 years. Promote the status of rural and community regeneration policies wilt good its effect, as well as changes within the community, the relationship between government policies, a test of the speed of evolution of rural regeneration. Therefore, the implementation of the future regeneration in rural areas need to strengthen the technology-driven: one internal; second industry, government academia, research to enhance mutual cooperation to promote the benefits of rural regeneration. On to the next policy to Rural Regeneration Incubation, are to be strengthened. Policies need to be more in line with community authenticity, while the training system and evaluation mechanism should have to be more rigorous in order to allow limited resources to maximize the benefits. Finally, is the incentive for rural regeneration policies need early, and subsequent spontaneous community driven, allowing nire autonomy and grassroots rural communities are rural regeneration policies to promote indicators.
|
|---|
