| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 犯罪學研究所 === 103 === Corruption cases have not been successfully and significantly prevented since the law of “public officials property declaration “ was implemented. The present study is to achieve two aims, one is to understand the relation between the violation of the public officials’ property declaration and the conviction of corruption crime through examining public officials’ untruthful declaration records and their possibility to be later prosecuted and convicted for corruption. . The other is to analyze whether or not those who violated Anti-Corruption Statute (Article 6-1) have previous illcit property declaration records.
The results indicate that The study found that: First, the Control Yuan deliberately inaccurate reporting by the investigation and the trial were higher than the proportion of units of the Agency Against Corruption, the conviction rate is high, and which congressperson of deliberately inaccurate reporting objects, thereafter subjected to investigation the trial of the highest proportion. Second, each reporting obligations deliberately inaccurate reporting year, the average interval during the investigation and suffered 2-4 years, shows up in the person of each of the reporting obligations accredited deliberately inaccurate reporting, that was getting to know the relevant units have not involved the corruption committed criminal violations. And most deliberately inaccurate reporting of the investigation suffered, their penalty cut the amount of most less than 15 million yuan, will be displayed financial disclosure laws for public officials involved in the corruption offenders commit crime deterrent remains beneficial, each guilty of the corruption-related offenders has not deliberately inaccurate reporting is not involved in the plot than the other perpetrators of serious violations the corruption. Third, from an unknown sin practical use of property of Corruption Offences Ordinance, as yet appear to property from unidentified sources separate investigation to prosecute the case, it can appear Restraining Criminal Law. Most involve criminal property from unidentified sources, mostly in cash, or head to hide assets from the account, nor deliberately inaccurate reporting but had suffered cut penalty record, display the current public officials to declare the property to check the way, can not effectively check hidden assets of unknown circumstances.
|
|---|
