An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names
碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理學院經營管理學程 === 103 === This paper applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) method to evaluate the operating efficiency of the major 15 smartphone brand names during the period from 2009 to 2013. DEA is used first to measure the overall technical efficiency (OTE) of those decision m...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2015
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/85gbpe |
id |
ndltd-TW-103NCTU5627035 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-103NCTU56270352019-05-15T22:33:37Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/85gbpe An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names 主要智慧型手機品牌商之營運績效研究 Yang, Shu-Hui 楊淑惠 碩士 國立交通大學 管理學院經營管理學程 103 This paper applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) method to evaluate the operating efficiency of the major 15 smartphone brand names during the period from 2009 to 2013. DEA is used first to measure the overall technical efficiency (OTE) of those decision making units (DMUs). The metafrontier analysis is then applied to compare the technology gap ratio (TGR) of the Great China brand names and the others. Finally, the total-factor input efficiency (TFIE) is used to compare the each factor input efficiency of Great China brand names and the others. We found that Apple and Huawei averagely are the most efficient in overall technical efficiency aspect, which could contrunitue to their succesful multiple product lines and markets. The Great China brand names TGR became higher than non-Great China’s from year 2012 and 2013, which means that the Great China brand names’ pure technical efficiency is closer to the industry metafrontier. The average operating cost efficiency and current asset input efficiency of Great China brand names are better than the non-Great China brand names, which means the Great China brand names utilize the operating cost and manage the current asset better while non-Great China brand names utilize the R&;D, S&;A cost and manage non-currnet asset more efficiently. Hu, Jin-Li 胡均立 2015 學位論文 ; thesis 45 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理學院經營管理學程 === 103 === This paper applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) method to evaluate the operating efficiency of the major 15 smartphone brand names during the period from 2009 to 2013. DEA is used first to measure the overall technical efficiency (OTE) of those decision making units (DMUs). The metafrontier analysis is then applied to compare the technology gap ratio (TGR) of the Great China brand names and the others. Finally, the total-factor input efficiency (TFIE) is used to compare the each factor input efficiency of Great China brand names and the others. We found that Apple and Huawei averagely are the most efficient in overall technical efficiency aspect, which could contrunitue to their succesful multiple product lines and markets. The Great China brand names TGR became higher than non-Great China’s from year 2012 and 2013, which means that the Great China brand names’ pure technical efficiency is closer to the industry metafrontier. The average operating cost efficiency and current asset input efficiency of Great China brand names are better than the non-Great China brand names, which means the Great China brand names utilize the operating cost and manage the current asset better while non-Great China brand names utilize the R&;D, S&;A cost and manage non-currnet asset more efficiently.
|
author2 |
Hu, Jin-Li |
author_facet |
Hu, Jin-Li Yang, Shu-Hui 楊淑惠 |
author |
Yang, Shu-Hui 楊淑惠 |
spellingShingle |
Yang, Shu-Hui 楊淑惠 An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names |
author_sort |
Yang, Shu-Hui |
title |
An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names |
title_short |
An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names |
title_full |
An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names |
title_fullStr |
An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Operating Performance Evaluation of Major Smartphone Brand Names |
title_sort |
operating performance evaluation of major smartphone brand names |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/85gbpe |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yangshuhui anoperatingperformanceevaluationofmajorsmartphonebrandnames AT yángshūhuì anoperatingperformanceevaluationofmajorsmartphonebrandnames AT yangshuhui zhǔyàozhìhuìxíngshǒujīpǐnpáishāngzhīyíngyùnjīxiàoyánjiū AT yángshūhuì zhǔyàozhìhuìxíngshǒujīpǐnpáishāngzhīyíngyùnjīxiàoyánjiū AT yangshuhui operatingperformanceevaluationofmajorsmartphonebrandnames AT yángshūhuì operatingperformanceevaluationofmajorsmartphonebrandnames |
_version_ |
1719131121319411712 |