The Innovation Industry System of the Diagnostic Medical Devices

碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理學院科技管理學程 === 103 === This study constructs an integrated model of innovation intensive services and industrial innovation systems, which include both firm-level and industry-level approaches. A case study was conducted on Taiwan’s IVD(In Vitro Diagnostics)Industry to elucidate it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hung, Hsiao-Lan, 洪曉嵐
Other Authors: Shyu, Joseph Z.
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/vrf2xk
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理學院科技管理學程 === 103 === This study constructs an integrated model of innovation intensive services and industrial innovation systems, which include both firm-level and industry-level approaches. A case study was conducted on Taiwan’s IVD(In Vitro Diagnostics)Industry to elucidate its future trend of development. This study dissects service value activities and externalities at the firm level and industrial environments and technological systems at the industry level. The model develops a strategy analysis by the IIS Matrix at the firm level. IIS-IIS Matrix will help deduce critical elements of industrial environment and technological systems at the industry level by strategic positioning and KSFs in the firm level. The requirements of industrial environment and technological systems will be consolidated into the industrial innovation systems by using the IIS approach. Results of the case study show that Taiwan’s IVD(In Vitro Diagnostics)Industry presently positions itself in the Selective Service Package/Product Innovation. The critical industrial innovation systems in this position include Factor Conditions, Receiver Competence, Connectivity, and Variety Creation Mechanism. In the next 5 years, the IVD(In Vitro Diagnostics)industry will transfer into the position of the Generic Service Package/Structural Innovation, which requires supports in Demand Conditions, Firm Strategy, Structure, Rivalry, and Connectivity. We recommend that the government should allocate resources in these critical industrial innovation systems preferentially, to enhance the competitive advantage of Taiwan’s IVD(In Vitro Diagnostics)Industry.