Meta-evaluation of Elementary School and Junior High School Principal Evaluation in New Taipei City

• Main Authors: Wu, Chia Shan, 吳佳珊
• Other Authors: Wu, Cheng Ta
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/33687840675873366844

碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 教育行政與政策研究所 === 103 === The purpose of this research is to realize the implement status of elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City, and to explore the elementary school and junior high school principals’ opinions on this evaluation. By examining the degree of the propriety, utility, feasibility, and accuracy dimension this evaluation gets, suggestions in accordance with the result of the research are made for improvements. The study adopted questionnaire survey, and the tool was “Questionnaire of meta-evaluation of elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City”. The research subjects were elementary school and junior high school principals who participated the first stage to the third stage elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City were surveyed. A total of 36 questionnaires were distributed; 31 valid returned ones were analyzed. Statistical techniques used include t-tests and one-way ANOVA. An interview research was also adopted in this study. 2 principals and 1 faculty who participated the first stage to the third stage elementary school and junior high school principal evaluation in New Taipei City were selected in order to get more information about the evaluation. According to the findings of the research, conclusions were summarized as followings: 1.The principal evaluation of elementary school and junior high school is approved in the propriety, utility, feasibility, and accuracy dimension. The propriety dimension gets the highest scores, followed by accuracy, feasibility, and utility dimension. 2.In the propriety dimension, there is 1 significant difference in the educational background. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 3.In the utility dimension, there is 1 significant difference in the educational background. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 4.In the feasibility dimension, there is 1 significant difference in the educational background. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 5.In the accuracy dimension, there are 2 significant differences in the educational background and the number of school classes. Master of education principals have higher agreement. 6.It’s feasible to implement the principal evaluation of elementary school and junior high school in New Taipei City, but it should be strengthened in the evaluation plan reflects community expectation, evaluation finding uses, the proposal of evaluation reporting is consistent with the different schools’ characteristics. Evaluation process taking into account the qualitative and quantitative data collection. 7.The principal evaluation of elementary school and junior high school in New Taipei City can truly reflects principals’ managing performance. The most helpful thing is to assist principals who examine their merits and shortcomings. Finally, the study provides suggestions to the administrative department and future researchers as reference resources. Key words：principal evaluation；meta-evaluation；meta-evaluation standards