| Summary: | 碩士 === 開南大學 === 人文社會學院公共管理碩士在職專班 === 103 === Crime correction is part of the criminal justice system, in which the criminal Correctional Institutions holds the burden of bringing justice and correcting criminal behavior in their hands. It is also a very important part of a legal administrative job. From a human resources management perspective, highly skilled corrections officers can help stabilize the prisoners, helping them to turn over a new leaf and pave a way back to society. The best and quickest way to develop a good quality of corrections workforce is to correctly use motivation. Therefore, establishing an appropriate, fair and justice system of promotion, under the guidance of the motivation theory, is the most important issue to these correctional institutions.
The study examples are focused on the government employees of the correctional division under the Department the Taipei Prison under the Agency of Corrections, Ministry of Justice, understanding what thoughts they have on promotion system of correctional institution, basing the research upon the procedure of filing an act of promotion. Using the means of institutional studies and the way to studying individual studies properties, through analyzing documents and interviews; sustaining support on promotion, fair conception and motivation academic theories to find out the structural, legal and functional purposes of the promotion system inside these correctional departments.
The following statements have been obtained after rigorous evidence and analysis:
1.Execution
The duration of the promoting procedure vary, influencing the correctional officer of anticipation
towards promotion and their trust in the system’s fairness.
2.Ruling
If the legal content of promotion steers away from motivating the staff, the mindset that they have
towards promotion would change, in effect causing the promotion system to change, in evidently
reaching the anticipations of correctional officer toward promotion.
3.Motivation
If the correctional officers have a fair conception towards promotion, those who were promoted would
have been motivated by what they had done. Those who had not been promoted would not have thought of
it as a punishment. However, if they didn’t have a fair conception towards promotion, those promoted
would not have thought it motivating and those who didn’t promote would see it as a punishment.
To conclude, according to the advice given through the results of this research, we hope to act as a reference to managers of the correctional departments and to future researchers.
|
|---|
