On Crimes participation patterns-from the principal offender and accomplice to distinction

• Main Authors: LI-XIN YU, 李星瑜
• Other Authors: Georg Gesk
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2015
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9jdhcx

碩士 === 玄奘大學 === 法律學系碩士班 === 103 === Taiwan in the field of criminal complicity in the field and committing to distinguish the doctrine has always been one of the priorities discussed included the concept of committing the principal offender alone , three indirect principal and co- principal offender , and the type of complicity is included instigator help make participation patterns . Perpetrator and accomplice of how to distinguish between the boundaries of the doctrine and practice of Taiwan on this issue for the difference between what you think? Doctrine doctrine Germany , Japan and Taiwan will discuss the distinction . Taiwan practice is to take a comprehensive theory of subjective and objective does not say . Perpetrator and accomplice of the boundaries will be used as the starting and then extended to the joint principal offender , seek joint principal offender , instigator and help offenders to participate in the discussion patterns do . It will be relevant in the study of literature in a number of scholars , monographs or journal articles and reference of Germany and Japan as discussed in academic literature , as well as the judgment of the case and the judicial practice insights on the current practitioners to standardize analysis and the method of literature as a central basis for interpretation of the article .