| Summary: | 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 科技管理學程碩士在職專班 === 103 === With the trend of rapid development of electronics technical standards, Taiwan connector industry is facing industrial upgrading under pressure, due to the way took from different business strategy, which leading to a superior or inferior operating efficiency results, so this paper is to explore the key factor which affect the domestic connector manufacturers operating efficiency, as the recommend direction to relatively inefficient manufacturers to improve operating performance.
In this study, we took 12 high homogeneity connector manufacturers as the research objects, the duration of study is from 2009 to 2013, by using of "Taiwan Economic Daily News (TEJ) Database" exported financial data as research materials, research methods uses Data Envelopment Analysis method to analyze the efficiency of the value of each Decision Making Units (DMU), selecting total assets, operating costs, operating expenses and research and development expenses and other items as input factors, and operating revenue and net profit as
the output factors. The results showed that among evaluated 60 DMU, there are nine DMU (Allotop 2009, ACES 2009, JESS-LINK 2009, JESS-LINK 2010, Coxoc 2012, Lotes 2010, Cvilux 2010, Cvilux 2011 , Cvilux 2012) reached overall efficiency , wherein Allotop is referred to 44 times; JESS-LINK 2010 is referred to 30 times; ACES is referenced 22 times, these units were regard as the robustly efficient units, and became benchmarking models for inefficient companies.; and Cvilux 2012 is referred to only once, it is not easy to follow or replicate efficiently DMU. Followed by the results of the analysis indicate the difference between the variable was not reaching completely efficient DMU, which potential to reduce the rate of amplitude to improve the investment entry. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows the difference of impact between each investment term and value of efficiency, In terms of average overall manufacturer, when the removal of the total assets is 0.02; the removal of operating costs is 0.068; the removal of research and development costs is 0.018, and the removal of business costs is 0.031.
Through the results of empirical analysis, which allowing decision-makers of manufacturers to understand the relative competitive advantage and disadvantage, providing reference to the poor operating performance unit, toward emphasis on efficiency and the optimal size of the business model, to face with global competition.
|
|---|
