| Summary: | 博士 === 中原大學 === 設計學博士學位學程 === 103 === Due to the importance of residential space to one’s life, examining design indicators for residential interior design and issues which maybe encountered in reality has become an essential and significant topic in interior design field. Therefore, the main goals of this study include the following: 1. Define related theories and its context of residential interior design assessment via related literature reviews. 2. Develop evaluation indicators and items for residential interior design. 3. Explore evaluation difference and degree of importance among indicators and items. 4. Examine divergence from different individual attributes to evaluation indicators and items; as well as provide interior design practitioners and the general public with findings and outcomes as references to residential design and modification. Content analysis, expert panels, Analytic Hierarchy Process, and questionnaire are all used in this study to achieve these research goals. As for research process, first, an expert initial residential interior design evaluation indicators and items are generated based on analyses from domestic and international residential interior design evaluation discourse. After discussion and revision from three expert meetings the evaluation concept and items are established. Later, the Expert questionnaire is finalized according to the consensus by 54 selected interior design practitioners and professors. In addition, the study uses Fuzzy Delphi Method to analyze the Expert questionnaire responses and select seven major residential interior design evaluation concepts, including 64 items. With the 64 items, questionnaire to residential space users are conducted later, and 311 valid questionnaires are collected with purposive sampling. Regarding test method and data analysis, no pilot-test is used, the exploratory factor analysis is used on its collected data. Subsequently, two elimination procces and three factor analyses are conducted; as a result, eight residential interior design evaluation indicator factors with 42 items assessment system is established. These eight indicators are “spatial aesthetics,” “sustainable design,” “safeguard prevention,” “human-oriented design,” “spatial flow,” “intelligent housing,” “furniture display,” and “physical environment.” The study also explains attribute distribution of the tested sample, descriptive statistics, and reliability and validity of the difference test and evaluation as well. Finally, suggestions and practical implementations to residential interior design assessment are provided from the research results.
|
|---|
