VOLUMETRIC INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY VS. FIXED FIELD IMRT IN NASOPHARYNX CANCER: A COMPARATIVE PLANNING STUDY
碩士 === 元培科技大學 === 放射技術研究所 === 102 === This study aims to compare treatment plans using sliding window Intensity modulated radiation therapy (SW-IMRT) and Rapid-arc in NPC patients. In this study, between 2008 and 2010, 33 patients with NPC were planned using both SW-IMRT and Rapid-arc techniques...
Main Authors: | CHIN-HSIUNG LIN, 林錦雄 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Weng-Tao Huang |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/m424mx |
Similar Items
-
Plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) and conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in anal canal cancer
by: Aillères Norbert, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01) -
Volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT for the treatment of upper thoracic esophageal cancer.
by: Wu-Zhe Zhang, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Validation of Monaco Treatment Planning System for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT®) on ELEKTA Infinity™ Linear Accelerator
by: Zouiri Saad, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Dosimetric Evaluation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Using AAPM TG 119 Protocol
by: Nainggolan A., et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Planning analysis for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric and efficiency comparisons between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), single-arc/partial-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (SA/PA-VMAT)
by: Zhou Xiaojuan, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)