Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914)

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所碩士班 === 102 === The Emancipation Reform of 1861 in Russia did not meet the peasants’ expectation: they were required to pay their landowners huge redemption payments allocation of land. This resulted in many revolutionary upsprings from 1905 to 1907, which had forced the Tsar to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sih-Han Chen, 陳思涵
Other Authors: Alexander Pisarev
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5xfq8b
id ndltd-TW-102TKU05481012
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-102TKU054810122019-05-15T21:42:34Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5xfq8b Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914) 俄羅斯帝國晚期史托里賓的土地改革:背景、內容、結果(1906~1914) Sih-Han Chen 陳思涵 碩士 淡江大學 歐洲研究所碩士班 102 The Emancipation Reform of 1861 in Russia did not meet the peasants’ expectation: they were required to pay their landowners huge redemption payments allocation of land. This resulted in many revolutionary upsprings from 1905 to 1907, which had forced the Tsar to reexamine the land reform program and support the agrarian reform initiated by the Prime-minister Pyotr Stolypin. Pyotr Stolypin’s Agarian Reform was aimed to remove the obstacles to Russian modernization. The fundamental part of it was to abandon rural communities with the allotment land and promote the ownership of private land, which enabled the peasants to establish single and individual farms and the independent farmsteads. By migration policy, the government hoped to transform the society and to consolidate the Tsar’s regime through the land reforms. Pyotr. Stolypin’s Agarian Reform played an important role in Russian history. At face value, the reform seemed to have achieved its aim to modernization, but it proved to be problematic. Indeed, the reform had facilitated the private landownership, and gave rise to an increase in peasants’ productivity. The agricultural economy at that time had surpassed that of the rural community with the allotment land. Somehow, the authorities could not initiate a reform without repressive measures. This caused the conflicts between the rich peasants and the poor peasants. Neither did the reform eliminate the problems of peasants. Nor did it save the Tsar’s regime from collapsing. In sum, the modernization was incomplete. While tradition values still dominated in the society, social and economic structure of the society had gone through a transformation. When the social reform failed to improve people’s life, they stood up and overthrew the Tsar. Alexander Pisarev 彼薩列夫 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 139 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所碩士班 === 102 === The Emancipation Reform of 1861 in Russia did not meet the peasants’ expectation: they were required to pay their landowners huge redemption payments allocation of land. This resulted in many revolutionary upsprings from 1905 to 1907, which had forced the Tsar to reexamine the land reform program and support the agrarian reform initiated by the Prime-minister Pyotr Stolypin. Pyotr Stolypin’s Agarian Reform was aimed to remove the obstacles to Russian modernization. The fundamental part of it was to abandon rural communities with the allotment land and promote the ownership of private land, which enabled the peasants to establish single and individual farms and the independent farmsteads. By migration policy, the government hoped to transform the society and to consolidate the Tsar’s regime through the land reforms. Pyotr. Stolypin’s Agarian Reform played an important role in Russian history. At face value, the reform seemed to have achieved its aim to modernization, but it proved to be problematic. Indeed, the reform had facilitated the private landownership, and gave rise to an increase in peasants’ productivity. The agricultural economy at that time had surpassed that of the rural community with the allotment land. Somehow, the authorities could not initiate a reform without repressive measures. This caused the conflicts between the rich peasants and the poor peasants. Neither did the reform eliminate the problems of peasants. Nor did it save the Tsar’s regime from collapsing. In sum, the modernization was incomplete. While tradition values still dominated in the society, social and economic structure of the society had gone through a transformation. When the social reform failed to improve people’s life, they stood up and overthrew the Tsar.
author2 Alexander Pisarev
author_facet Alexander Pisarev
Sih-Han Chen
陳思涵
author Sih-Han Chen
陳思涵
spellingShingle Sih-Han Chen
陳思涵
Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914)
author_sort Sih-Han Chen
title Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914)
title_short Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914)
title_full Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914)
title_fullStr Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914)
title_full_unstemmed Pyotr Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in Late Imperial Russia: Background, Realization and Results (1906~1914)
title_sort pyotr stolypin’s agrarian reform in late imperial russia: background, realization and results (1906~1914)
publishDate 2014
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5xfq8b
work_keys_str_mv AT sihhanchen pyotrstolypinsagrarianreforminlateimperialrussiabackgroundrealizationandresults19061914
AT chénsīhán pyotrstolypinsagrarianreforminlateimperialrussiabackgroundrealizationandresults19061914
AT sihhanchen éluósīdìguówǎnqīshǐtuōlǐbīndetǔdegǎigébèijǐngnèiróngjiéguǒ19061914
AT chénsīhán éluósīdìguówǎnqīshǐtuōlǐbīndetǔdegǎigébèijǐngnèiróngjiéguǒ19061914
_version_ 1719118698203054080