Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments
碩士 === 東吳大學 === 哲學系 === 102 === Moral dilemma is always a remarkable issue in popular or academic debates. This paper is an analysis of Williams' and Foot's arguments, concerning the relationship of moral dilemma and moral realism within the field of metaethics. In the development of the m...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/r9gp2y |
id |
ndltd-TW-102SCU00259001 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-102SCU002590012019-05-15T21:13:58Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/r9gp2y Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments 道德衝突與道德實在論 —對威廉斯與芙特之論爭的考察 Meng-Heng Yang 楊孟衡 碩士 東吳大學 哲學系 102 Moral dilemma is always a remarkable issue in popular or academic debates. This paper is an analysis of Williams' and Foot's arguments, concerning the relationship of moral dilemma and moral realism within the field of metaethics. In the development of the modern ethics, the debates have the following two aspects. Firstly, contrary to the traditional approach that the feelings of a moral agent are absent in moral debates, but now become the main theme of the argument, namely of the feelings of regret and guilt. Secondly, the concept of moral realism is proposed only formally in metaethical debates, but now clarified by Foot of its possible substantial content. Jau-Hwa Chen 陳瑤華 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 88 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 東吳大學 === 哲學系 === 102 === Moral dilemma is always a remarkable issue in popular or academic debates. This paper is an analysis of Williams' and Foot's arguments, concerning the relationship of moral dilemma and moral realism within the field of metaethics. In the development of the modern ethics, the debates have the following two aspects. Firstly, contrary to the traditional approach that the feelings of a moral agent are absent in moral debates, but now become the main theme of the argument, namely of the feelings of regret and guilt. Secondly, the concept of moral realism is proposed only formally in metaethical debates, but now clarified by Foot of its possible substantial content.
|
author2 |
Jau-Hwa Chen |
author_facet |
Jau-Hwa Chen Meng-Heng Yang 楊孟衡 |
author |
Meng-Heng Yang 楊孟衡 |
spellingShingle |
Meng-Heng Yang 楊孟衡 Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments |
author_sort |
Meng-Heng Yang |
title |
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments |
title_short |
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments |
title_full |
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments |
title_fullStr |
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Realism —An Analysis of Williams' and Foot's Arguments |
title_sort |
moral dilemmas and moral realism —an analysis of williams' and foot's arguments |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/r9gp2y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT menghengyang moraldilemmasandmoralrealismananalysisofwilliamsandfootsarguments AT yángmènghéng moraldilemmasandmoralrealismananalysisofwilliamsandfootsarguments AT menghengyang dàodéchōngtūyǔdàodéshízàilùnduìwēiliánsīyǔfútèzhīlùnzhēngdekǎochá AT yángmènghéng dàodéchōngtūyǔdàodéshízàilùnduìwēiliánsīyǔfútèzhīlùnzhēngdekǎochá |
_version_ |
1719111666988220416 |