Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.

碩士 === 東吳大學 === 社會學系 === 102 === This paper, based on Mead and Erikson's theory of self-development and identity, try to investigate the descendants of Mainlanders who born in 1970s and 80s. How did they have their identity? And how did they transform their identity when they in the face of loc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia Hsin HU, 胡家欣
Other Authors: Chia Ming Chang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/fqzt65
id ndltd-TW-102SCU00208011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-102SCU002080112019-05-15T21:13:58Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/fqzt65 Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s. 外省族群後裔的身分認同、形成與轉變-以70年代及80年代為例 Chia Hsin HU 胡家欣 碩士 東吳大學 社會學系 102 This paper, based on Mead and Erikson's theory of self-development and identity, try to investigate the descendants of Mainlanders who born in 1970s and 80s. How did they have their identity? And how did they transform their identity when they in the face of localization in Taiwan? They were born and grew up in critical time between Martial law’s late period and the lifting of the order’s early period. How did they deal with the situation when the mainstream ideology was different from theirs in Taiwan society? Seven descendants of Mainlanders were chosen as research participants based on the method of purposive sampling, and to do in-depth interview with them. Try to better understand their opinion and systematically answer the questions above. Accordingly, we can know the descendants of Mainlander’s identity mainly from family socialization. Family is very significant to their self and identity formation in early socialization stage. Party-state ideology is mainstream ideology in 1970s and 80s. Born in 1970s descendants of Mainlanders were deeply affected by the Party-state ideology. But born in 1980s were not affected by the Party-state ideology so powerful. After lifting of Martial law, Taiwan became a democratic society. The change makes their original identity different from mainstream ideology, and therefore they also transform their identity. Their identity change took for a long time, not overnight. On ethnic or national significance, they think they are Taiwanese and ROC nationals. On cultural significance, they think they are Chinese. These are different dimensions of identities, but no contradiction among them. Taiwanese, ROC nationals and Chinese can harmony for them. Their identity isn’t only one dimension, and they can have great diversity of a unified identity. Chia Ming Chang 張家銘 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 123 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 東吳大學 === 社會學系 === 102 === This paper, based on Mead and Erikson's theory of self-development and identity, try to investigate the descendants of Mainlanders who born in 1970s and 80s. How did they have their identity? And how did they transform their identity when they in the face of localization in Taiwan? They were born and grew up in critical time between Martial law’s late period and the lifting of the order’s early period. How did they deal with the situation when the mainstream ideology was different from theirs in Taiwan society? Seven descendants of Mainlanders were chosen as research participants based on the method of purposive sampling, and to do in-depth interview with them. Try to better understand their opinion and systematically answer the questions above. Accordingly, we can know the descendants of Mainlander’s identity mainly from family socialization. Family is very significant to their self and identity formation in early socialization stage. Party-state ideology is mainstream ideology in 1970s and 80s. Born in 1970s descendants of Mainlanders were deeply affected by the Party-state ideology. But born in 1980s were not affected by the Party-state ideology so powerful. After lifting of Martial law, Taiwan became a democratic society. The change makes their original identity different from mainstream ideology, and therefore they also transform their identity. Their identity change took for a long time, not overnight. On ethnic or national significance, they think they are Taiwanese and ROC nationals. On cultural significance, they think they are Chinese. These are different dimensions of identities, but no contradiction among them. Taiwanese, ROC nationals and Chinese can harmony for them. Their identity isn’t only one dimension, and they can have great diversity of a unified identity.
author2 Chia Ming Chang
author_facet Chia Ming Chang
Chia Hsin HU
胡家欣
author Chia Hsin HU
胡家欣
spellingShingle Chia Hsin HU
胡家欣
Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.
author_sort Chia Hsin HU
title Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.
title_short Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.
title_full Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.
title_fullStr Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.
title_full_unstemmed Identity formation and its transformation of descendants of Mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.
title_sort identity formation and its transformation of descendants of mainlanders born in 1970s and 80s.
publishDate 2014
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/fqzt65
work_keys_str_mv AT chiahsinhu identityformationanditstransformationofdescendantsofmainlandersbornin1970sand80s
AT hújiāxīn identityformationanditstransformationofdescendantsofmainlandersbornin1970sand80s
AT chiahsinhu wàishěngzúqúnhòuyìdeshēnfēnrèntóngxíngchéngyǔzhuǎnbiànyǐ70niándàijí80niándàiwèilì
AT hújiāxīn wàishěngzúqúnhòuyìdeshēnfēnrèntóngxíngchéngyǔzhuǎnbiànyǐ70niándàijí80niándàiwèilì
_version_ 1719111665595711488