A Study on in-depth report of Taiwan reporter─Take the Golden Tripod Award, Wu Shun-wen Journalism Awards, Excellent Journalism Award for Example (2001-2010)

• Main Authors: Jing-Yu You, 游京諭
• Other Authors: Qi-Yang Lin
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2014
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ga7359

碩士 === 國立臺北教育大學 === 台灣文化研究所 === 102 === In-depth report is the integration of various kinds of report form, it must be integrated the complete background of event, analysis the cause of the news, the impact and trend, and reported with the deep thinking. Also, it can state the author’s subjective position and explain the significance of news. In addition to pay attention to the explanation and analysis, in-depth report should emphasis on the application of skills and the arrangement of the story because of its length and numerous of words. The establishments of Golden Tripod Award, Wu Shun-wen Journalism Awards and Excellent Journalism Award are to improve the literacy of media, upright its ethos and set a good example, they are the credible news awards in Taiwan. Seen from the prize winning comments can find out the reasons why the awards can be stood out, mainly because of the choice of the theme, or overall structure of the report, non-mentioned application of narrative skills or the detail description of the plot, characters, environment in the structure, and those are precisely the indispensable factors that a in-depth report needed to attract readers and convey ideas. This study carries on research by the in-depth report awards of Golden Tripod Award, Wu Shun-wen Journalism Awards and Excellent Journalism Award, to understand selection of context and its purpose by type analysis. And on the basis of narrative to explore its detailed structure applications on narrative technique, plot, characters and environment etc. It can be found that the in-depth report awards were with caring traits like making the people's voices heard, taking upon oneself on supervision of the government and enterprise, exploring various uncaring and needed improvements; On narrative techniques, they were gradually got rid of the narrative framework, and added other narrative techniques. Narrative perspectives were no longer paying attention on the author’s omniscient perspective only, but to intersperse the internal focalization perspective in the text, take the perspective of characters to make the voices of the other person heard. The use of time was also more flexible, there were more than order and flashbacks or interleave, to increase the overall changes of structure. On language, characters on discourse language and brief dialogues were gradually added to increase the coverage voices of other "people", and make the report more vivid. Thus it can be seen that the in-depth report awards were applied with deft use of words and narrative skills to some extent.