Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale
碩士 === 國立臺中教育大學 === 教育測驗統計研究所 === 102 === The purpose of this research is design an on-line brace score scale platform to improve the problems of percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale, because it has several defects, include it take longer test time, harder to answer questions ,and it does not an...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2014
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43bn37 |
id |
ndltd-TW-102NTCT0629008 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-102NTCT06290082019-05-15T21:03:46Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43bn37 Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale 拉條式與百分比式模糊語意量表之探究 Hong Hao-Wei 洪浩瑋 碩士 國立臺中教育大學 教育測驗統計研究所 102 The purpose of this research is design an on-line brace score scale platform to improve the problems of percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale, because it has several defects, include it take longer test time, harder to answer questions ,and it does not an intuition method, consequently we compare the difference between this two scales, include reliability, validity ,score and test time difference, IPA, and discard scale ratio. After our test with 175 samples in junior high school, and finish these researches step by step, we get the following conclusions: 1.The percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's reliability is 0.722, the brace score scale 's reliability is 0.776, the brace score scale's reliability is better than the percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale. 2. The percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's accumulation explanation is 53.632%, and the brace score scale 's accumulation explanation is 53.592%, the difference between this two scale is really small. 3.The paired-samples T test's result of test time and score are both significant, it means the brace score scale 's test time is obvious shorter then percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale, and there scores have obviously difference. 4.For IPA, the brace score scale 's average variance is 0.25, higher than the percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's 0.12, it means the brace score scale can get more samples' degree of importance. 5.The brace score scale 's discard scale ratio is 7.53%, lower then the percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's 19.25%. Chen Guei-shia 陳桂霞 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 63 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺中教育大學 === 教育測驗統計研究所 === 102 === The purpose of this research is design an on-line brace score scale platform to improve the problems of percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale, because it has several defects, include it take longer test time, harder to answer questions ,and it does not an intuition method, consequently we compare the difference between this two scales, include reliability, validity ,score and test time difference, IPA, and discard scale ratio.
After our test with 175 samples in junior high school, and finish these researches step by step, we get the following conclusions:
1.The percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's reliability is 0.722, the brace score scale 's reliability is 0.776, the brace score scale's reliability is better than the percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale.
2. The percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's accumulation explanation is 53.632%, and the brace score scale 's accumulation explanation is 53.592%, the difference between this two scale is really small.
3.The paired-samples T test's result of test time and score are both significant, it means the brace score scale 's test time is obvious shorter then percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale, and there scores have obviously difference.
4.For IPA, the brace score scale 's average variance is 0.25, higher than the percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's 0.12, it means the brace score scale can get more samples' degree of importance.
5.The brace score scale 's discard scale ratio is 7.53%, lower then the percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale's 19.25%.
|
author2 |
Chen Guei-shia |
author_facet |
Chen Guei-shia Hong Hao-Wei 洪浩瑋 |
author |
Hong Hao-Wei 洪浩瑋 |
spellingShingle |
Hong Hao-Wei 洪浩瑋 Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale |
author_sort |
Hong Hao-Wei |
title |
Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale |
title_short |
Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale |
title_full |
Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale |
title_fullStr |
Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale |
title_sort |
research of brace score and percentage score fuzzy linguistic scale |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43bn37 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT honghaowei researchofbracescoreandpercentagescorefuzzylinguisticscale AT hónghàowěi researchofbracescoreandpercentagescorefuzzylinguisticscale AT honghaowei lātiáoshìyǔbǎifēnbǐshìmóhúyǔyìliàngbiǎozhītànjiū AT hónghàowěi lātiáoshìyǔbǎifēnbǐshìmóhúyǔyìliàngbiǎozhītànjiū |
_version_ |
1719110151655391232 |