| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺中教育大學 === 數學教育學系 === 102 === Abstract
Evaluation of the second phase of a study to develop with the reliability and validity of written tests for junior high school students one dollar equation Surveying concept to explore students' problem-solving situations of this unit, the error caused by the wrong type, and reasons. Three stages of research to understand the basic concepts of the students in one dollar equation by two-stage open-ended questionnaire to assess written test, analyze and discuss the reasons for students to make mistakes and the wrong type of way through the interview.
Conclusion of the study is divided into two parts to illustrate:
First, two-tier the development of paper-based diagnostic assessment:
(1) Reliability: the internal consistency reliability coefficients were greater than after deletion and determine the type of questions are A, were retained.
(2) In addition to the open-ended questionnaire and interviews and evidence collection methods to understand the types of errors students outside the research tools also used to test the two-way breakdown diagnostic assessment of content validity, and after surveying repeated analysis and discussion, to screen test subject.
Second, the error pattern: nine categories in the following way to illustrate Significance：
(1) The text symbols.
(2) Column-text symbols.
(3) Abbreviated text symbols (combined).
(4) Find the value of the formula.
(5) Understand one dollar equation.
(6) A way to drive out one yuan.
(7) To understand one yuan a solution of the equation.
(8) Solving a linear equation (the same amount of axioms).
(9) The application of (algebraic word problems).
|
|---|
