Prediction of Athletic Justice Perception toward Athletic Trust in Coaches

碩士 === 國立體育大學 === 體育研究所 === 102 === The purpose of this study was to examine how athletic justice perception including five dimensions: distribution justice, procedural justice, voice, interpersonal justice, and informational justice affected athletic trust in coaches. Participants were 456 athletic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feng-Wen Liang, 梁鳳紋
Other Authors: Chu-Min Liao
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/74618326707716082601
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立體育大學 === 體育研究所 === 102 === The purpose of this study was to examine how athletic justice perception including five dimensions: distribution justice, procedural justice, voice, interpersonal justice, and informational justice affected athletic trust in coaches. Participants were 456 athletic students with regularly training of senior high school. The survey data were collected from 7 senior high and vocational high schools in the northern counties of Taiwan. "Athletic Justice Perception Questionnaire" and "Scale for Trust in Leader" were adapted as questionnaires. This study applied Pearson product-moment correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analysis to analyze data. The findings were as following: 1、There were all positive correlations between athletic distribution justice perception, procedural justice perception, voice perception, interpersonal justice perception, informational justice perception and athletic trust in coaches. 2、Athletic distribution justice perception, procedural justice perception, and informational justice perception had significant power of prediction toward athletic trust in coaches. Furthermore, variance of explanation of athletic informational justice perception and procedural justice perception toward athletic trust in coaches were higher than distribution justice perception. The conclusion was as following: when coaches coach athletes, they must concern about athletic distribution justice perception, procedural justice perception, and informational justice perception. In this way, athletic trust in coaches can be improved. Therefore, if coaches want to enhance athletic performance, they should match athletic anticipation when applying resource distribution, management and reward system. As long as understanding athletic justice perception, improving the way of getting along well between athletes and coaches, athletes should trust in coaches more and perform better in the future.