A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University
碩士 === 臺北市立教育大學 === 教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士班 === 101 === The purpose of this study was to construction the self-study indicators, and to confirm the weigh system. Fuzzy Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process were adopted as the main research methods. First through the analysis of literature revie...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2013
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30598479879137498020 |
id |
ndltd-TW-101TMTC5778036 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-101TMTC57780362017-04-16T04:34:33Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30598479879137498020 A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University 大學自我評鑑指標建構之研究 黃瑞廷 碩士 臺北市立教育大學 教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士班 101 The purpose of this study was to construction the self-study indicators, and to confirm the weigh system. Fuzzy Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process were adopted as the main research methods. First through the analysis of literature review, a “questionnaire on construction of the university self-study indicators” was developed. Next, we invited 30 experts who are educational scholars, school evaluators, and entrepreneurs to compose a Fuzzy Delphi Group in order to reach a consensus. According to their opinions, we selected indicators and weighted each of them. Finally, “the university self-study indicators”were established. According to the above research methods and the analysis, the conclusions of the study are as follows: 1.The university self-study system contains “School self-positioning, vision and goals”, “School Management and Administration”, “Education Quality”, “Accountability and Social Services”, and “Quality assurance and sustainability”, 5 dimensions and 22 indicators and all have well fitness. 2.In the entire weight system, “Education Quality”was ranked as the most important whereas “Accountability and Social Services”was ranked the least important. 3.Among the five dimenstions, the most advantageous weight indicators are “School based on features, clear self-positioning”, “Promoting school development plan”, “Teachers Retainment mechanism and operation”, and“the quality assurance mechanisms of school continuous improvement”. Base on the above conclusions, this study prsents suggestion for the educational administration, universities, and future studies. Chun-Rong Liu 劉春榮 2013 學位論文 ; thesis 171 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 臺北市立教育大學 === 教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士班 === 101 === The purpose of this study was to construction the self-study indicators, and to confirm the weigh system.
Fuzzy Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process were adopted as the main research methods. First through the analysis of literature review, a “questionnaire on construction of the university self-study indicators” was developed. Next, we invited 30 experts who are educational scholars, school evaluators, and entrepreneurs to compose a Fuzzy Delphi Group in order to reach a consensus. According to their opinions, we selected indicators and weighted each of them. Finally, “the university self-study indicators”were established.
According to the above research methods and the analysis, the conclusions of the study are as follows:
1.The university self-study system contains “School self-positioning, vision and goals”, “School Management and Administration”, “Education Quality”, “Accountability and Social Services”, and “Quality assurance and sustainability”, 5 dimensions and 22 indicators and all have well fitness.
2.In the entire weight system, “Education Quality”was ranked as the most important whereas “Accountability and Social Services”was ranked the least important.
3.Among the five dimenstions, the most advantageous weight indicators are “School based on features, clear self-positioning”, “Promoting school development plan”, “Teachers Retainment mechanism and operation”, and“the quality assurance mechanisms of school continuous improvement”.
Base on the above conclusions, this study prsents suggestion for the educational administration, universities, and future studies.
|
author2 |
Chun-Rong Liu |
author_facet |
Chun-Rong Liu 黃瑞廷 |
author |
黃瑞廷 |
spellingShingle |
黃瑞廷 A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University |
author_sort |
黃瑞廷 |
title |
A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University |
title_short |
A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University |
title_full |
A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University |
title_fullStr |
A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University |
title_full_unstemmed |
A study on Construction of Self-study Indicator in University |
title_sort |
study on construction of self-study indicator in university |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30598479879137498020 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT huángruìtíng astudyonconstructionofselfstudyindicatorinuniversity AT huángruìtíng dàxuézìwǒpíngjiànzhǐbiāojiàngòuzhīyánjiū AT huángruìtíng studyonconstructionofselfstudyindicatorinuniversity |
_version_ |
1718438769748606976 |