Before and after the two sides signed the "two sides of the Taiwan Strait to jointly crack down on crime and mutual legal assistance agreement, the two sides jointly combat fraud crime Practice Research

• Main Authors: Zhong-Da Wang, 王中大
• Other Authors: 潘錫堂
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2013
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/d8m8d6

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 中國大陸研究所碩士在職專班 === 101 === Since November 2, 1987 the government open to visit relatives on both sides, cross-strait exchanges henceforth officially kicked off. However, with closer cross-strait exchanges, as derived from smuggling illegal immigrants, illegal firearms, drugs, goods smuggling, fraud, money laundering, economic crime, organized crime and other non-traditional security threats, particularly in criminal fraud, involving broadest , the largest number of victims, endangering the worst. Although the two sides in 1990 "Kinmen Agreement" on the basis of cooperation, further on April 26, 2009 in Nanjing signed "cross-strait common fight against crime and mutual legal assistance agreement" agreement comes into effect, the two sides in the fight against crime and mutual legal assistance on , tends to be normalized and institutionalized fraud cases for investigation, and it is frequently gains; while this mean that those who "cross-strait common fight against crime and mutual legal assistance agreement" signed in the prevention of fraud cases do occur on the expected effect? This study is to use this academic theory and structure analysis to explore after signing the agreement on both sides to jointly crack down on the practice of criminal fraud. This study found that the official data show, Taiwan, the number of fraudulent breach of trust cases occurred, to 2005, reached a peak, but to a steady decline year by year since 2009, ended 2012, the total number has dropped to 20,637 pieces. With the mainland authorities to exchange criminal intelligence, including fraud, kidnapping, drugs, murder, robbery and money laundering, embezzlement cases like cracked 68 cases total, 4,538 people arrested suspects, quite remarkable results. However, there are still practical operation pending subsequent coprocessor following dilemma: a Continental Association Ji case for selective cooperation. Two, unable to grasp an investigation aging. Third, the mainland financial, telecommunications data is not perfect, is difficult to trace traceability. Four, communications surveillance and underground remittance pipeline is not easy to trace. Fifth, the contact window can not meet current situation demands. Secondly, the study also found that the surface still perform the following discord of the Department, subject to the parties to overcome: First, contact the status window can not meet demand. Second, the lack of fighting crime intelligence integrated system platform. Third, cross border fraud crime has gradually shifted to Southeast Asia stronghold national trends. Fourth, the lack of attempts to prevent the underground pipeline as Trident. Five, failed to effectively eradicate dummy account and head phones. And recommendations: First, the police liaison officers stationed in each other. Second, to build an integrated system to combat crime intelligence platform. Third, strengthen cooperation with Southeast Asian countries in combating crime cooperation and exchange. Four, aggravated criminal, to eliminate underground remittance pipes. Five, strong seizing telecommunications room, platforms, etc. five specific recommendations.