The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010

碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 地學研究所地理組碩士班 === 101 === For to the 2010 International Flora Exposition in Taipei, the municipal government implements a series of amenity projects. One of which is rewarded floor area, that is, the government levies the private land with old buildings with prescription, and turns t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lin,Yi-Tseng, 林易增
Other Authors: Chao,Chien-Hsiung
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/33603162354930761455
id ndltd-TW-101PCCU0136002
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-101PCCU01360022015-10-13T21:56:01Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/33603162354930761455 The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010 台北市2009年與2010年廢棄建物減量及美化市容景觀之租地成本分析 Lin,Yi-Tseng 林易增 碩士 中國文化大學 地學研究所地理組碩士班 101 For to the 2010 International Flora Exposition in Taipei, the municipal government implements a series of amenity projects. One of which is rewarded floor area, that is, the government levies the private land with old buildings with prescription, and turns them into green parks for public use temporarily. In other words, the government “rent” the land to glorify the city by rewarding floor area as a bonus. This study calculates the profit through the market price, announced land price, housing construction costs, land lease costs and green landscaping costs, and finds out that due to the floor area provided by the government. The land owners who participate in this project will earn about $ 86,000 to $ 123,000 in per ping land. All 58 study areas will produce a total benefit from about $ 1.8 billion and 97.04 million to $ 2.7 billion and 17.78 million. As a land-use improved project in a very short period of time, it also a project that municipal government changed the land use by levying right. It’s much better to rent the land by government since the $6.7 billion total cost was under and save at most $20 billion of social cost compared with floor area reward. Floor area regulation is one of the best methods limiting land use by government, but now it becomes a policy-driven reward, and this will lead both to the failure of land-use control and to the impact of the housing market price. By applying a policy that both lacks an overall assessment and pursuits immediate short-term outcomes, does it truly protect the rights of the residents or conform to the social justice of the essence and distribution? Chao,Chien-Hsiung 趙建雄 2012 學位論文 ; thesis 104 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 地學研究所地理組碩士班 === 101 === For to the 2010 International Flora Exposition in Taipei, the municipal government implements a series of amenity projects. One of which is rewarded floor area, that is, the government levies the private land with old buildings with prescription, and turns them into green parks for public use temporarily. In other words, the government “rent” the land to glorify the city by rewarding floor area as a bonus. This study calculates the profit through the market price, announced land price, housing construction costs, land lease costs and green landscaping costs, and finds out that due to the floor area provided by the government. The land owners who participate in this project will earn about $ 86,000 to $ 123,000 in per ping land. All 58 study areas will produce a total benefit from about $ 1.8 billion and 97.04 million to $ 2.7 billion and 17.78 million. As a land-use improved project in a very short period of time, it also a project that municipal government changed the land use by levying right. It’s much better to rent the land by government since the $6.7 billion total cost was under and save at most $20 billion of social cost compared with floor area reward. Floor area regulation is one of the best methods limiting land use by government, but now it becomes a policy-driven reward, and this will lead both to the failure of land-use control and to the impact of the housing market price. By applying a policy that both lacks an overall assessment and pursuits immediate short-term outcomes, does it truly protect the rights of the residents or conform to the social justice of the essence and distribution?
author2 Chao,Chien-Hsiung
author_facet Chao,Chien-Hsiung
Lin,Yi-Tseng
林易增
author Lin,Yi-Tseng
林易增
spellingShingle Lin,Yi-Tseng
林易增
The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010
author_sort Lin,Yi-Tseng
title The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010
title_short The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010
title_full The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010
title_fullStr The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010
title_full_unstemmed The Cost Analysis of the Project of Dilapidated-Buildings Reduction and Amenity Landscaping in Taipei City between 2009 and 2010
title_sort cost analysis of the project of dilapidated-buildings reduction and amenity landscaping in taipei city between 2009 and 2010
publishDate 2012
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/33603162354930761455
work_keys_str_mv AT linyitseng thecostanalysisoftheprojectofdilapidatedbuildingsreductionandamenitylandscapingintaipeicitybetween2009and2010
AT línyìzēng thecostanalysisoftheprojectofdilapidatedbuildingsreductionandamenitylandscapingintaipeicitybetween2009and2010
AT linyitseng táiběishì2009niányǔ2010niánfèiqìjiànwùjiǎnliàngjíměihuàshìróngjǐngguānzhīzūdechéngběnfēnxī
AT línyìzēng táiběishì2009niányǔ2010niánfèiqìjiànwùjiǎnliàngjíměihuàshìróngjǐngguānzhīzūdechéngběnfēnxī
AT linyitseng costanalysisoftheprojectofdilapidatedbuildingsreductionandamenitylandscapingintaipeicitybetween2009and2010
AT línyìzēng costanalysisoftheprojectofdilapidatedbuildingsreductionandamenitylandscapingintaipeicitybetween2009and2010
_version_ 1718071111838597120