| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 資訊管理系 === 101 === In the general learning effectiveness evaluation process conducted by schools or training institutions, the teaching effectiveness of a teacher and institution is only evaluated by the outcome of students’ learning satisfaction after the end of courses.
The evaluation methods may include 4 dimensions: course contents, lecturer, teaching materials and customer service to assess the degrees of learner’s satisfaction.
This study adopted the theories of system display method and learning effectiveness evaluation try to construct an on-line evaluation system of learning effectiveness in order to providing a multi-dimensions evaluating result which may adopted for different fields expanding in the future. Further, by the use of results of cross-correlation analysis and relative diagrams to provide the lecturers a modulating reference for their teaching content.
This study confirmed the practicability and availability of its’ developed prototype system via system implement and verification, and ultimately used empirical approach of case study to verified the outcomes and benefits of this system. We used questionnaires and in-depth interviews for data collections and found 5 findings as followed:
(1)The system may use for multi-dimensions effectiveness evaluation and may expand and adopt for different fields in the future;
(2)To complete the construction of learning effectiveness evaluation system and system verification;
(3)The evaluation results of learning effectiveness system could as the basis references for lecturers’ teaching improvement indeed;
(4)The process design for learning effectiveness system could increase objectiveness of unstructured system and consistency of the outcome, which could help evaluating process simplification and further increase the efficiency of learning effectiveness;
(5)To provide the analysis of teaching content for lecturer to well know the status of the learners and improve the teaching content.
According to our conclusions, we proposed two suggestions for educator and the institutions associated:
(1)Although whether achieving instruction objectives or not is an essential teaching index in elementary school and junior high, yet, it seldom refers teacher autonomy in Higher education. Therefore, how to motivate lecturer to value this part could be the goal.
(2)Teacher evaluation is main part of current instructional evaluation. This couldn’t well understand how much the students obtained from the courses. This study may be the references of improving index.
The three suggestions for the future researcher are as followed:
(1)To integrate the learning effectiveness evaluation system with teaching improvement.
(2)Try to integrate diversified instructional evaluation methods into this system in order to perfect the system function.
(3) To find the optimized hierarchy of instruction objectives and weight assessment mode. Owing to the limits of current instruction objectives hierarchy, the more complete and detail categories may increase the reliability and validity of system’s outcome.
|
|---|
