| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 財政學系 === 101 === Observe whether the great injustices of this problem of the gap between the pension of public servants and the general labor, so we designed experiments to see the experimental participants preference whether this system. We decided to use the experimental method to determine the amount of the pension that is determined by the amount of the contribution by the pension account? Depending on the presence or absence of a civil official?
Cappelen et al. (2006) a review of the fair concept has the following three aspects: strict egalitarianism, libertarianism, and liberal egalitarianism. We use experimental economics to test whether, in accordance with the identity assigned, can be considered fair concept. In Hoffman et al. (1994) mentioned in this article regarding the competitive effects of the distribution of output results game. Today civil official is to be qualified to serve through the competition civil service examinations, so we have to discuss Hoffman et al (1994) article. Our experiments and the Cappelen et al (2007) are different. First, we consider the identity factors, second is the reward for talent non-random participants in efforts. ;, and Hoffman, et al (1994 ) differences are for reward participants in efforts.
Identity respectively stage simulate civil service exam, the stage of production and contribution income simulate work aside pension to allocate money aside stage analog allocated pension.
The experimental data which we recruited 32 National Taipei University students to participate in experiments.” Income ratio” is dependent variable.“Contribution ratio”and”partner identity as 1 “is independent variable.「Contribution ratio」is significantly .「 partner identity as 1 」is insignificantly.
According to the analysis of our experimental data, experimental participants generally agreed to that if one want to share higher income from provision should have higher contribution relatively. Ranking of the exam has no relation to contribution. Participants didn’t consider the ranking of exam.
|
|---|
