| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 科學教育研究所 === 101 === In everyday life, learners face social scientific issue (socio-scientific issues), how to conduct a scientific, objective thinking and decision-making, has been regarded as an important field of science education is one of the topics. Issues in social science thinking decision making process, informal reasoning (informal reasoning) plays an important role. Compared to the standard scientific reasoning thinking, according to a clear theme, premise and conclusion, informal reasoning thinking problems faced mostly highly complex and controversial. Therefore, many scholars have pointed out that "stand" and "attitude" in informal reasoning thinking processes play an important role. Although the attitude is one of the important factors affecting decision making, but little research addressed issues in the face of the social sciences, the learner's knowledge and attitudes of the issues between the association. If the learner's attitudes and knowledge among relevant, teachers in the face of social science issues, the more to be vigilant, should provide objective information to construct the learner's knowledge to help learners to establish an objective attitude, conduct informal reasoning thinking.
This study is divided into several stages to clarify the nuclear energy and green energy issues in the social sciences, attitudes and knowledge related.
First (Study 1), this study develops Implicit Attitudes Test (Implicit Association Test), assess the learner's attitude. According to the learner's implicit attitudes (implicit attitude), we distinguish learner preferences nuclear groups, and prefer green energy group.
Secondly (study two), this study assessed implicit attitudes and relationships between cognitive structure, the experimental group showed preference for nuclear energy Green Energy Group and preferences cognitive structure analysis is no different.
The third (study three), this study assessed implicit attitudes and knowledge grouping quality (information-processing strategy) the relationship between the experiments showed no significant difference between the two groups.
The fourth (four studies), this study assessed implicit attitudes and critical knowledge of the relationship between the discovery of nuclear energy group had a higher preference for nuclear knowledge and green energy advantages disadvantages of knowledge, relative, green energy group had a higher preference for green Nuclear energy advantages disadvantages of knowledge and knowledge.
Studies have shown that four critical knowledge and implicit attitudes have relationships between. Try to study five further clarify implicit attitudes and critical knowledge of the relationship between implicit attitudes found that critical knowledge will increase with the change.
Further analysis of this study, the implicit attitude change with increased knowledge of the relationship between critical (of six), the learner based on attitude change situations are divided into groups with the trend towards nuclear energy Green Energy group, the experimental group show attitude towards nuclear energy, increased more Advantages of nuclear energy knowledge and knowledge of green energy disadvantage relative, attitudes towards green energy group increased more green energy advantages disadvantages of knowledge and knowledge of nuclear energy, in which each group of the "anti-party stance shortcomings knowledge" effect seems much higher than the "Own stance advantages knowledge. "
The results indicated that implicit attitudes and absorption between critical knowledge about. In addition, learners nuclear - green energy issues and the absorption change of attitude about anti-party stance shortcomings. Provide teachers with training in social science issues learners reasoning, decision-making in the course of thinking, and perhaps should be taken to provide the objectivity and integrity of the message.
|
|---|
