The Comparison Study of Ability Estimates - Using Different IRT Scoring Models with Subtests
博士 === 國立臺南大學 === 教育學系測驗統計博士班 === 101 === The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of ability estimates in the application of subtests, such as Bi-Factor Model (DeMars, 2006b) , Rasch subdimensions model (Brandt, 2008), and Augmented scores method (Wainer & Thissen, 2001). Meanwhi...
Main Authors: | Szu-cheng Lu, 盧思丞 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Bor-Yaun Twu |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2013
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92169021811302111728 |
Similar Items
-
The Comparison of the Accuracy of Ability Estimates--Using Three IRT Scoring Models with Testlet-Based Tests
by: Szu-wen Hsu, et al.
Published: (2008) -
The Comparison of IRT Software''s Estimate Accuracy
by: Chao,Shu-Chen, et al.
Published: (1998) -
IRT scoring procedures for TIMSS data
by: Gregory Camilli, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Impacts of Ignoring Nested Data Structure in Rasch/IRT Model and Comparison of Different Estimation Methods
by: Chungbaek, Youngyun
Published: (2017) -
Bayesian Estimation of Mixture IRT Models using NUTS
by: Al Hakmani, Rahab
Published: (2018)