A Comparison between Researches by Liang and Chien on the Academic History of the Ching Dynasty – with a Focus on the Chinese Academic History of the Last Three Centuries
碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 中國文學系研究所 === 101 === Both Mr. Liang Ch’i Ch’ao and Mr.Ch’ien Pin Ssu wrote different books with the same name the“Academic History of China of the Past 300 Years”. Their writing techniques are considerably distinct. Mr. Liang used the style of academic history ,but Mr. Ch’ien used...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | zh-TW |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/d72wea |
| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 中國文學系研究所 === 101 === Both Mr. Liang Ch’i Ch’ao and Mr.Ch’ien Pin Ssu wrote different books with the same name the“Academic History of China of the Past 300 Years”. Their writing techniques are considerably distinct. Mr. Liang used the style of academic history ,but Mr. Ch’ien used Chinese traditional” Xue''an Essay Style” to write the academic thoughts of Ch’in Confucian. Mr. Liang spent a good portion of his book “Intellectual trends in the Ch’in period” comparing the similarity of west and east culture which were the Ch’in academic and the Renaissance respectively. The Manchurian Incident occurred when Mr. Ch’ien Pin Ssu was teaching the class of “Academic History of China of the Past 300 Years”. It let Mr. Ch’ien Pin Ssu think about the topic of Chinese traditional culture and Nationalism and his book is full its influence. All throughout history researchers compared the books”Intellectual trends in the Ch’in period” of Mr. Liang Ch’i Ch’ao and ” Academic History of China of the Past 300 Years”. However, for this thesis, I consulted all their books about the history of Ch’in academic and tried to find the difference between Mr. Ch’ien and Mr. Liang.
|
|---|