A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process
博士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 國際文教與比較教育學系 === 101 === Through the document analysis and comparative method, this research attempted to review the performance of Bologna Process, and to understand the development of European Higher Education Area (EHEA). In order to know the specific European country how to ca...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2013
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/07711344558820013750 |
id |
ndltd-TW-101NCNU0578004 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-101NCNU05780042015-10-13T21:56:32Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/07711344558820013750 A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process 歐洲高等教育區之發展─波隆納進程之檢視與評析 Chou,Huachi 周華琪 博士 國立暨南國際大學 國際文教與比較教育學系 101 Through the document analysis and comparative method, this research attempted to review the performance of Bologna Process, and to understand the development of European Higher Education Area (EHEA). In order to know the specific European country how to carry out the Bologna Process, this research is chosen UK to review its results of Bologna Process. The conclusions of this research as follows: 1.Bologna Process is the most important policy of higher education in EU, the main purpose of Bologna Process is to establish the EHEA by different action lines of social dimension, mobility, employability and attractiveness. According to the latest Bologna Process implement report, which shows the framework of EHEA are basically completed, but still need to accomplish the details of action lines before 2020. 2.According to Bologna Process implement report, the best performance of the indicator in Bologna Process is “Access to the next cycle”, and the worst is “Level of international participation in external quality assurance”. Although some countries have outstanding performance in implement of Bologna Process like Denmark, basically countries’ performance of Bologna Process are uneven. How to reduce the gap between high scored and low scored countries in Bologna Process’s indicators would be the major challenge in future. 3.According to Bologna Process stocktaking and implement report for past years, the best performance of UK in Bologna Process indicator category is “Degree systems”, and the worst is “Quality assurance”. UK needs to improve the level of international participation in external quality assurance. Chang,Ying 楊瑩 2013 學位論文 ; thesis 202 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
博士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 國際文教與比較教育學系 === 101 === Through the document analysis and comparative method, this research attempted to review the performance of Bologna Process, and to understand the development of European Higher Education Area (EHEA). In order to know the specific European country how to carry out the Bologna Process, this research is chosen UK to review its results of Bologna Process. The conclusions of this research as follows:
1.Bologna Process is the most important policy of higher education in EU, the main purpose of Bologna Process is to establish the EHEA by different action lines of social dimension, mobility, employability and attractiveness. According to the latest Bologna Process implement report, which shows the framework of EHEA are basically completed, but still need to accomplish the details of action lines before 2020.
2.According to Bologna Process implement report, the best performance of the indicator in Bologna Process is “Access to the next cycle”, and the worst is “Level of international participation in external quality assurance”. Although some countries have outstanding performance in implement of Bologna Process like Denmark, basically countries’ performance of Bologna Process are uneven. How to reduce the gap between high scored and low scored countries in Bologna Process’s indicators would be the major challenge in future.
3.According to Bologna Process stocktaking and implement report for past years, the best performance of UK in Bologna Process indicator category is “Degree systems”, and the worst is “Quality assurance”. UK needs to improve the level of international participation in external quality assurance.
|
author2 |
Chang,Ying |
author_facet |
Chang,Ying Chou,Huachi 周華琪 |
author |
Chou,Huachi 周華琪 |
spellingShingle |
Chou,Huachi 周華琪 A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process |
author_sort |
Chou,Huachi |
title |
A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process |
title_short |
A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process |
title_full |
A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process |
title_fullStr |
A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process |
title_full_unstemmed |
A study on the Development of the European Higher Education Area: With a Review of the Bologna Process |
title_sort |
study on the development of the european higher education area: with a review of the bologna process |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/07711344558820013750 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chouhuachi astudyonthedevelopmentoftheeuropeanhighereducationareawithareviewofthebolognaprocess AT zhōuhuáqí astudyonthedevelopmentoftheeuropeanhighereducationareawithareviewofthebolognaprocess AT chouhuachi ōuzhōugāoděngjiàoyùqūzhīfāzhǎnbōlóngnàjìnchéngzhījiǎnshìyǔpíngxī AT zhōuhuáqí ōuzhōugāoděngjiàoyùqūzhīfāzhǎnbōlóngnàjìnchéngzhījiǎnshìyǔpíngxī AT chouhuachi studyonthedevelopmentoftheeuropeanhighereducationareawithareviewofthebolognaprocess AT zhōuhuáqí studyonthedevelopmentoftheeuropeanhighereducationareawithareviewofthebolognaprocess |
_version_ |
1718071815245398016 |