On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese

碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 語言學研究所 === 101 === This thesis investigates the distribution of the bare classifier phrase [CL+N] in Mandarin Chinese. Previous studies argue that [CL+N] is the phonological reduction of the indefinite numeral classifier phrase [yi+CL+N] (Lu 1990, Chen 2004), and it cannot occu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Ching Perng, 陳景芃
Other Authors: Her, One Soon
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20088691897843496942
id ndltd-TW-101NCCU5462001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-101NCCU54620012016-09-11T04:08:30Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20088691897843496942 On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese 漢語光桿分類詞組之分析 Chen, Ching Perng 陳景芃 碩士 國立政治大學 語言學研究所 101 This thesis investigates the distribution of the bare classifier phrase [CL+N] in Mandarin Chinese. Previous studies argue that [CL+N] is the phonological reduction of the indefinite numeral classifier phrase [yi+CL+N] (Lu 1990, Chen 2004), and it cannot occur in subject or topic position because [yi+CL+N] in these positions are never considered indefinite (Cheng & Sybesma 1999/2005, Li 1998, Huang, Li & Li 2009). Two predictions are made from these analyses. First, all indefinite [yi+CL+N] can be reduced to [CL+N], and second, [CL+N] only occurs in positions which are considered indefinite. However, it is easily found in Mandarin Chinese that numeral classifier phrase denoting quantity can also be reduced to bare classifier phrase [CL+N], and that not all [CL+N] occur in indefinite positions. In other words, previous studies simply explain the occurrence of [CL+N], but fail to predict the occurrence of [CL+N]. With a close examination, I suggest that numeral classifier phrase [yi+CL+N] denoting quantity can also be reduced to bare classifier phrase [CL+N] except occurring in contrastive contexts. Also, I adopt the clitic account on classifiers in Mandarin since they share many properties with clitics. Morphologically, classifiers in Mandarin never appear in isolation but attach to preceding elements. Syntactically, they are free to cliticize to hosts belonging to different categories but are not subject to syntactic roles. Phonologically, classifiers in Mandarin subcategorize their hosts within a maximal number of moras. Therefore, I argue that it is not (in)definiteness that decides the occurrence of the bare classifier [CL+N] but whether it can find a legal host to cliticize. Constraints concerning to the legal hosts will also be discuss in detail in my thesis. Her, One Soon 何萬順 學位論文 ; thesis 109 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 語言學研究所 === 101 === This thesis investigates the distribution of the bare classifier phrase [CL+N] in Mandarin Chinese. Previous studies argue that [CL+N] is the phonological reduction of the indefinite numeral classifier phrase [yi+CL+N] (Lu 1990, Chen 2004), and it cannot occur in subject or topic position because [yi+CL+N] in these positions are never considered indefinite (Cheng & Sybesma 1999/2005, Li 1998, Huang, Li & Li 2009). Two predictions are made from these analyses. First, all indefinite [yi+CL+N] can be reduced to [CL+N], and second, [CL+N] only occurs in positions which are considered indefinite. However, it is easily found in Mandarin Chinese that numeral classifier phrase denoting quantity can also be reduced to bare classifier phrase [CL+N], and that not all [CL+N] occur in indefinite positions. In other words, previous studies simply explain the occurrence of [CL+N], but fail to predict the occurrence of [CL+N]. With a close examination, I suggest that numeral classifier phrase [yi+CL+N] denoting quantity can also be reduced to bare classifier phrase [CL+N] except occurring in contrastive contexts. Also, I adopt the clitic account on classifiers in Mandarin since they share many properties with clitics. Morphologically, classifiers in Mandarin never appear in isolation but attach to preceding elements. Syntactically, they are free to cliticize to hosts belonging to different categories but are not subject to syntactic roles. Phonologically, classifiers in Mandarin subcategorize their hosts within a maximal number of moras. Therefore, I argue that it is not (in)definiteness that decides the occurrence of the bare classifier [CL+N] but whether it can find a legal host to cliticize. Constraints concerning to the legal hosts will also be discuss in detail in my thesis.
author2 Her, One Soon
author_facet Her, One Soon
Chen, Ching Perng
陳景芃
author Chen, Ching Perng
陳景芃
spellingShingle Chen, Ching Perng
陳景芃
On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese
author_sort Chen, Ching Perng
title On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese
title_short On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese
title_full On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese
title_fullStr On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese
title_full_unstemmed On the bare classifier phrase in Mandarin Chinese
title_sort on the bare classifier phrase in mandarin chinese
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20088691897843496942
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchingperng onthebareclassifierphraseinmandarinchinese
AT chénjǐngpéng onthebareclassifierphraseinmandarinchinese
AT chenchingperng hànyǔguānggǎnfēnlèicízǔzhīfēnxī
AT chénjǐngpéng hànyǔguānggǎnfēnlèicízǔzhīfēnxī
_version_ 1718383047876804608