| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 法學院碩士在職專班 === 101 === Rapidly changing in modern society, there is increased demand for paternity testing to validate a child’s biological parents. DNA paternity testing is accepted as scientific and admissible evidence of paternity suit in Family Court. There are no controls on paternity organizations and members in Taiwan. In addition to medical institutions, there are biotech companies and cord blood banks that perform paternity tests. The quality of the reports and accuracy of the results are in doubt. DNA paternity testing determines whether two individuals have a biological parent-child relationship. The test also encompasses ethical issues of individual identity, harmony of the family, the best interests of minor children, autonomy of the children and privacy of genetic information.
Since there is no standard practice guide on paternity test services, it is important to ensure the quality of the report and protect right and interest of the party. This article discusses the incomplete laws regarding paternity testing and protecting the welfare of those subjected to paternity testing, especial children. With reference to paternity laws of Swiss, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Japan, the article suggests a complete system to protect right and interest of the party and welfare of the society.
|
|---|
