A Comparison of Agency Cost for Different Corporate Governance Models：Taiwan vs. China vs. Hong Kong
碩士 === 義守大學 === 財務金融學系 === 101 === In different countries, have different social systems (such as culture and customs), the legal system and the political system, and finally evolved a variety of structural problems, and thus the formation of the corporate governance structure and governance model i...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | zh-TW |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/u2j7sb |
| Summary: | 碩士 === 義守大學 === 財務金融學系 === 101 === In different countries, have different social systems (such as culture and customs), the legal system and the political system, and finally evolved a variety of structural problems, and thus the formation of the corporate governance structure and governance model is different, and in economic development of different modes of governance to follow a different path of institutional change.
This study examines the comparison of national systems as described, but mainly to differences in agency costs with two corporate governance models which are Japan-Germany Model and UK-US Model. The purpose of this study is to find out which of the model will give a better performance with low agency costs by using Taiwan (Japan-Germany Model), China (Japan-Germany Model) and Hong Kong (UK-US Model) as the example.
|
|---|