美國「本土成長型」恐怖份子之威脅及因應作為之研究

• Main Author: 吳國浦
• Other Authors: 汪毓瑋
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 1011
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/7mb83t

碩士 === 中央警察大學 === 外事警察研究所 === 101 === Abstract From May 2009 through October 2011, arrests were made for several “homegrown” jihadist-inspired terrorist plots by American citizens or legal permanent residents of the United States. Two of these resulted in attacks—U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan’s alleged assault at Fort Hood in Texas and Abdulhakim Muhammed’s shooting at the U.S. Army-Navy Career Center in Little Rock, AR—and produced 14 deaths. By comparison, in more than seven years from the September 11, 2001, terrorist strikes (9/11) through April 2009, there were 21 such plots. Two resulted in attacks, and no more than six plots occurred in a single year (2006). The apparent spike in such activity from May 2009 to October 2011 suggests that at least some Americans—even if a tiny minority—continue to be susceptible to ideologies supporting a violent form of jihad. This article describes homegrown violent jihadists and the plots and attacks that have occurred since 9/11. For this article , “homegrown” and “domestic” are terms that describe terrorist activity or plots perpetrated within the United States or abroad by American citizens, legal permanent residents, or visitors radicalized largely within the United States. The term “jihadist” describes radicalized individuals using Islam as an ideological and/or religious justification for their belief in the establishment of a global caliphate, or jurisdiction governed by a Muslim civil and religious leader known as a caliph. The term “violent jihadist” characterizes jihadists who have made the jump to illegally supporting, plotting, or directly engaging in violent terrorist activity. The article also discusses the development of threat trends of global terrorism then introduce the evolution of anti-terrorism strategy in U.S and including 911 before, George W. Buch government, and Obama government. To analyze the radicalization process and force driving violent extremist activity. It analyzes post-9/11 domestic jihadist terrorism and describes law enforcement and intelligence efforts to combat terrorism and the challenges associated with those efforts. It also outlines actions underway to build trust and partnership between community groups and government agencies and the tensions that may occur between law enforcement and engagement activities.