| Summary: | 碩士 === 長榮大學 === 高階管理碩士在職專班 === 101 === “Leadership” is always a main emphasis in human history, especially in the army. The triumph of war is relied heavily on the leading style and technique of the leader, to decide whether the team may complete tasks successfully and achieve the mission of building a well-prepared military force.
The objective of this research was to discuss the relationships among leading styles, working attitude and performance in the army, and added in the paternalistic leadership to discuss the interacting effect between working behavior and working performance of front-line personnel.
This research took a troop in air force as subject, to realize their level of identification for items in questionnaires through Likert six-point scale. The statistical analyses including descriptive statistics, validity, reliability, factor and regression analysis were processed through SPSS 18.0. The results showed:
1.Benevolence leadership had significantly positive effect on active working behavior, while the effect of moral leadership was not significant, therefore the role-model approach failed to initiate active control of risks.
2.Active working behavior had significantly positive influence on working performance, which showed that actively discovering and disposing problems may be beneficial for risk management, reduce errors and further elevate quality and performance of tasks.
3.The interacting effects among paternalistic leadership, active working behavior and human resource system had significantly influences on active working behavior and working performance.
The current army management is no more management of authority, the caring leadership create bonding of employees for the entity, to effectively elevate the team performance.
|
|---|
