Analysis of the Critical Success Factors of Taiwan Plastic Industry from Porter Diamond Model Perspective

碩士 === 南台科技大學 === 高階主管企管碩士班 === 100 === Abstract This study applied literature reviews based on the Taiwan plastic industry, Porter diamond model, and critical success factors(CSF), and the main purpose of this study was used Porter diamond model perspective to discuss the critical success factors i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsu Kuo Tang, 徐國棠
Other Authors: 賴明材
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 101
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/28543436182925320656
Description
Summary:碩士 === 南台科技大學 === 高階主管企管碩士班 === 100 === Abstract This study applied literature reviews based on the Taiwan plastic industry, Porter diamond model, and critical success factors(CSF), and the main purpose of this study was used Porter diamond model perspective to discuss the critical success factors in Taiwan plastic industry. Meanwhile, the research subjects were divided into two groups. The purpose of first group was to construct each critical success factor for critical success factor hierarchical framework in Taiwan plastic industry(include six decision dimensions and twelve critical success factors). Secondly, this study applied the expert questionnaire to measure the relative weights and priority order from the critical success factor hierarchical framework in Taiwan plastic industry. The results of this study were as following: 1. The top five decision dimensions were “chance” (weight was 0.223), “government” (weight was 0.208), “firm strategy, structure & rivalry” (weight was 0.183), “related and supporting industries” (weight was 0.167), and “factor conditions” (weight was 0.128). The last decision dimension was “demand factors)” (weight was 0.091). 2. The top five critical success factors were “ECFA” (weight was 0.114), “to develop emerging markets” (weight was 0.109), “high value products & development policies” (weight was 0.106), “intellectual property, financing, and guidance measure” (weight was 0.102), and “high-added value products & development strategies” (weight was 0.099).