An Experimental Study Of The Relationship Among Thinking Styles, Team Improvisation, Team Flow And Team Creativity: Relationship Quality Between Members As Moderator

• Main Authors: Wu, Chiachun, 吳佳駿
• Other Authors: Fang, Hsiangming
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2012
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/32704729152119305450

碩士 === 靜宜大學 === 管理碩士在職專班 === 100 === Team improvisation is a ability that team members can create various and novel solutions thought communicating rapidly when they suffer unexpected events. It was inspirited by the performance of jazz music and applied into management practices. Team flow is the state that all team members are so involved in an activity that nothing else seems too matter. Team flow would improve the performance of a team. The exploration to the relationship between Team improvisation and Team flow inspireed the research. Through a systematical literature review, this research examined the relationship among team improvisation, team flow, thinking styles and team creativity then tested the moderator of relationship quality between members.A total of 638 high school students divided to 117 teams, and each team shall finish the task which researcher assigned them. In addition, there were five specialists judge on the team creativity. Immediately after the task, asked participants completed the questionnaire to test whether the control variable success or not as well as the support of hypothesis. The major findings were as follows: 1. The teams with divergent thinking style show better extent of team improvisation than the ones with convergent thinking style. 2. The extent of team improvisation would result in positively effect of team flow. 3. Moderators of relationship have positive effect between the receptions of quality between members, team improvisation and team flow. 4. The extent of team immersed in flow would result in positively effect of team creativity performance. Finally, some implication and suggestions for apply the findings to academic research and management practice, guidance and the directions for further research are suggested based on the findings and the limitations of this study.