Practice of the Freedom of the Press in China: Cases of Hollington Kong Tong and Xingye Ma

• Main Authors: Yu-Chia Yueh, 樂羽嘉
• Other Authors: Ena Chao
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2012
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/41488582658703876134

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 歷史學研究所 === 100 === This research aims to explore how the Chinese students who studied journalism in the U.S. adjusted their differences and paradoxes between the ideals of American Journalism and the KMT''s propaganda principles by analyzing the articles and activities of Mr. Hollington K. Tong and Mr. Xingye Ma. Hollington Kong Tong deeply internalized the American ideals of freedom of the press and journalistic professionalism. However, when China was in crisis, Tong surrendered to patriotism and promoted propaganda, censorship and cultivated propagandists for the KMT. Tong faced huge pressures from Chiang Kai-Shek and the KMT top officials so that he couldn''t loosen the framework of censorship. U.S. journalists and professors felt their freedoms were threatened and fought with Tong. This position ultimately caused him significant regret. Xingye Ma initially devoted himself to journalistic education. Chiang Kai-Shek asked Ma to train propagandists for the KMT, but Ma advocated freedom of the press and wanted students to become professional journalists rather than propagandists. He combined the Three Principles of the People, traditional Chinese ethics and American journalistic professionalism to shape his views of journalism, in which he underscored the interests of the country, the nation and the aforementioned Three Principles of the People as the highest principles for Chinese journalists. To comply with the KMT''s needs, Ma ignored the principle of independence. Ma enriched Chinese journalism while limiting the rooms of freedom. He also believed that social responsibilities are more important than freedom of the press. But when Ma was in charge of the Central Daily News, he operated it as an enterprise and adopted a policy of nonintervention. Ma let young journalists cover sensitive topics and publish critical editorials. It is clear that Ma believed in some America ideals and thought that the press should monitor the government to promote democracy. Moreover, Tong and Ma were attracted toward freedom of the press and anticipated to modernize Chinese journalism, but the political pressures restrained them from widening this freedom. However, admittedly, they still have contributions for professionalizing journalism.