| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 園藝學研究所 === 100 === Recent Studies on specific environmental fittingness of landscape facilities had emphasized on the congruence of facilities’ color, texture, or architectural attributes with their surroundings. These studies stressed on the visual perception of the physical environment, however, perceptive processes from environmental stimulus also encompass other senses and cognitions. Environmental psychologists had pointed out that preferences of landscape could be varied by denotative and connotative meanings evoked from places. Furthermore, function of man-made objects has been suggested to be a factor attributes to the sense of contextual fittingness. Accordingly, the main purpose of this study is to figure out whether the evaluations of color fittingness of gazebo would vary among different place meanings. There first step of this study investigated semantic differential on recreational places, second step investigated associational colors and suitable colors of landscape facilities of recreational places, the third step examined the effects of gazebo color fittingness by place labels. The main results of this study indicated that the gazebo with brown roof and white pillar was the most fittingness one when it labeled as historical site or national park, the least fittingness in theme park label. The gazebo with yellow roof and white pillar was considered the most fittingness when it labeled as theme park, and the least fittingness when it labeled as national park. The yellow roof and yellow pillar was considered the most fittingness when it labeled as theme park, and the least fittingness when it labeled as historical site or without label. The present study suggests and supplies an appropriate planning policy of environmental design.
|
|---|
