Structural Composition Theory on Parthood

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 哲學研究所 === 100 === There are a number of material objects in our ordinary life, and most of them composed by their parts. But, is there any condition to be satisfied for the composition of material objects? This is so-called Special Composition Question (SCQ): What are the sufficie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia-Hao Hsieh, 謝嘉豪
Other Authors: Meng-Yao Peng
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13778923739509882304
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 哲學研究所 === 100 === There are a number of material objects in our ordinary life, and most of them composed by their parts. But, is there any condition to be satisfied for the composition of material objects? This is so-called Special Composition Question (SCQ): What are the sufficient and necessary conditions for any xs out of which an object is composed? I introduce Restricted Composition, Nihilism and Universalism. Although each of these theories has its own answer to SCQ, and also offers some convincing reasons to support its own account, but they all face some serious problems. Hence, I reject these theories. And I find that the series of works by Kit Fine provides more plausible approach to SCQ. Fine suggests that we pay more attention to the aspect of structure of material objects, and I call this account Structuralism. I defend this account in the last chapter and conclude that a theory of composition is acceptable, only when it can well explain the nature of structural composition.