Temporary Art Space and Urban Creative Field: A Case Study of Urban-Core-Arts-Block in Taipei Metroplitan

• Main Authors: Sun, Wen-Chien, 孫文謙
• Other Authors: Chang, Jung-Ying
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2012
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/93181936545492669660

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 都市計劃研究所 === 100 === In 2010, the rise of temporary strategy of creative city in Taipei City resulted in the presence of temporary art space, Urban-Core-Arts-Block. The aim of this study is to explore the reason of presence and the impact of temporary art space.We started with the approach of economic geography and political economy. And the theory of the urban creative field and the space of flows had been part of the formation of our study. The method included qualitative interviews and literature analysis for exploring the relationship among the temporary art space, artists and the Taipei metropolitan. The conclusions exhibited that Taipei metropolitan have emerged the creative field from four sectors: transactional network, local labour market and employment, the phenomenon of place and the regulation of state. It was also said as markert factor, production factor, social network factor and institute factor. And the creative field merged the artists and the art spaces as a cluster. For artists, the joint with the space of flows through art space was an effective way of career development. And many of such opportunities were found in Taipei metropolitan. Temporary art space is also the practice of urban entrepreneurship, the enterprise acquired the know-how of cooperation between entreprise and artists. They solved the problems effectively and infused the space of flows to facilitate the process of creativity. It is to say, both space and actors are key elements to form the presence of temporary art space. It can also be clarified as five factors: Tapei as a transactional center of real estate and arts, the institute of urban renewal of state, the rise of investment of Taipei contemporary visual arts, the diversified strategy of small and medieum-sized enterprise and the structure of creative field of Taipei metropolitan. Finally, though construting temporary art space can be a strategy for a creative city to facilitate the development of creativity of urban, allow the creative ideas to interact with each others, but the structure is usually internally fragmented. During these two years, the enterprise, artists and the neighborhoods did not make new and in-depth relationships, the harmonious relationships can only develop to the basic stage.The learning and interation were weak and the conflicts existed. It led to a discounted result of creative milieu. Apparently, the paradox has emerged between the discourse and the practice. The distrust and diffused doubt could threaten the prospects of the creative field of Taipei metropolitan. The argument is still there that urban creative field theory could explain the reason why artists clustering within Taipei metropolitan, but could not explain well the phenomenon of fragmentation.