On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法律學系一般生組 === 100 === This dissertation disscuss the “emergency surgery treatment” of medical behavior. Due to the scope of emergency surgery treatment is wide. Firstly, defining the “emergency injured patient ” and the “emergency surgery treatment” in chapter 2. For the reason the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, Hsin Yi, 黃馨儀
Other Authors: Cheng, Yat Che
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/25835935978845759125
id ndltd-TW-100NTPU0194023
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-100NTPU01940232015-10-13T21:12:26Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/25835935978845759125 On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment 急救手術行為阻卻違法事由之競合 Huang, Hsin Yi 黃馨儀 碩士 國立臺北大學 法律學系一般生組 100 This dissertation disscuss the “emergency surgery treatment” of medical behavior. Due to the scope of emergency surgery treatment is wide. Firstly, defining the “emergency injured patient ” and the “emergency surgery treatment” in chapter 2. For the reason the emergency surgery treatment is most involved the constitutive requirements of criminal law. Seperating this concept for three parts-- intention, negligence,Non-Interference particularizing at chpter3,4,5 will easier to know the concept of constitutive requirements and justification excuse possibility involved of the criminal law. In chpater3, disscuss that all the emegency surgery treament is “intended” and negligence is inexistent. Then using case study disscuss the justification excuses about the intended constitutive requirements such as: An act performed in accordance with law or order, A proper act performed in the course of business, An act performed by a person in defence of his own rights, For the third person avert imminent danger, The promise by the victim, Conjecturable promise by the victim. In chapter4, distinguishing the concept of “medical obligation” and “necessary medical obligation” and exampling the case about emergency surgery treatment with both “negligence constitutive requirement” and “aggravated result constitutive requirement ” In chapter5, defining the “suretyship” of Non-Interference emergerncy surgery treatment and continue using case study compare the constitutive requirement of “intended” medical treatment withhold. At last disscuss about the justification excuse within “obligation conflict” and “ the third person avert imminent danger”. Conclude all the researching in Chapter6, and suggest for the practice of medical litigation nowadays. Cheng, Yat Che 鄭逸哲 2012 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法律學系一般生組 === 100 === This dissertation disscuss the “emergency surgery treatment” of medical behavior. Due to the scope of emergency surgery treatment is wide. Firstly, defining the “emergency injured patient ” and the “emergency surgery treatment” in chapter 2. For the reason the emergency surgery treatment is most involved the constitutive requirements of criminal law. Seperating this concept for three parts-- intention, negligence,Non-Interference particularizing at chpter3,4,5 will easier to know the concept of constitutive requirements and justification excuse possibility involved of the criminal law. In chpater3, disscuss that all the emegency surgery treament is “intended” and negligence is inexistent. Then using case study disscuss the justification excuses about the intended constitutive requirements such as: An act performed in accordance with law or order, A proper act performed in the course of business, An act performed by a person in defence of his own rights, For the third person avert imminent danger, The promise by the victim, Conjecturable promise by the victim. In chapter4, distinguishing the concept of “medical obligation” and “necessary medical obligation” and exampling the case about emergency surgery treatment with both “negligence constitutive requirement” and “aggravated result constitutive requirement ” In chapter5, defining the “suretyship” of Non-Interference emergerncy surgery treatment and continue using case study compare the constitutive requirement of “intended” medical treatment withhold. At last disscuss about the justification excuse within “obligation conflict” and “ the third person avert imminent danger”. Conclude all the researching in Chapter6, and suggest for the practice of medical litigation nowadays.
author2 Cheng, Yat Che
author_facet Cheng, Yat Che
Huang, Hsin Yi
黃馨儀
author Huang, Hsin Yi
黃馨儀
spellingShingle Huang, Hsin Yi
黃馨儀
On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment
author_sort Huang, Hsin Yi
title On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment
title_short On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment
title_full On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment
title_fullStr On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment
title_full_unstemmed On Concurrence of Justification Excuse about Emergency Surgery Treatment
title_sort on concurrence of justification excuse about emergency surgery treatment
publishDate 2012
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/25835935978845759125
work_keys_str_mv AT huanghsinyi onconcurrenceofjustificationexcuseaboutemergencysurgerytreatment
AT huángxīnyí onconcurrenceofjustificationexcuseaboutemergencysurgerytreatment
AT huanghsinyi jíjiùshǒushùxíngwèizǔquèwéifǎshìyóuzhījìnghé
AT huángxīnyí jíjiùshǒushùxíngwèizǔquèwéifǎshìyóuzhījìnghé
_version_ 1718057778195464192