| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系 === 100 === Purpose: The study included two purposes: One attempted to analyze the coaching behavior of Judo coaches in the City of Taipei, giving their students training courses to get performance in the Judo contests, and the other aimed to explore coaches’ and Judo trainees’ perceptions of the given coaching behavior. Participants: Three coaches and thirty trainees were recruited by a random sampling method from a purposeful selected high school in the Taipei City. Method: A qualitative research method was adopted with several research instruments, including a revised ASUOI observation protocol to record 9 sessions of Judo training behavior followed by a questionnaire, semi-structured interview, and field notes. Data analysis: The results of the collected data were summarized as follows:
1. The instruction-oriented training took up 76.24% of the coaching behavior of the three selected cases, among which the most frequent coaching behavior observed referred to on-spot instruction, positive demonstration, body assistance and hustle respectively; on the other hand, non-coaching behavior took up 23.76%, with the least appeared behaviour—negative demonstration, undecodable, blame, and question-posing. Moreover, the major instruction referred to positive demonstration and the feedback for proceeding the training focused on praise-giving rather than blame-giving. Regarding the frequency of training behavior, it was found that the times of training were beginning mid-term post-session of the contest and they would be decreased gradually in accordance with the coaches’ mock contest given when approaching the contest date.
2. The statistical results showed significantly consistent in the perceptions of coaching behavior between coaches and trainees. They were regarded as effective coaching performance. The semi-structured interview results revealed that a high level of consistency was found between the two participant groups (coaches and Judo trainees), in which these participants suggested that the most frequent shown coaching behavior included positive demonstration, body assistance, and oral hustle. In addition, when probed more in-depth, the study found some slightly differences in the explored coaching behavior perceptions between these two groups, reflecting that it was of great significance to make a balance between a qualitative and a quantitative research method applied.
|
|---|
