| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系在職進修碩士班 === 100 === The main purposes of this study were threefold as follow:
1.To investigate the role of the leading style of PE
teachers in participation motivation of students.
2.To compare participation motivation in different
socioeconomic status students toward the certain leading
style of PE teachers.
3.To discuss the correlation between the” Leading style of
PE teachers” and “Participation motivation of
students”.This research involved a questionnaire survey
by stratified random sampling, and 6 schools of 352
secondary school students participated in the study. We
used “Leading Styles of PE Teacher Scale”
and “Participation Motivation in PE Class Scale” as our
research tools. The results of this study were the
followings:
1.The variables “Transformational leadership” got the
highest score and “Non- transformational leadership”
got the lowest score. In “Learning motivation of
students” the variables “Internal motivation” got the
highest score, and “Non-motivation” got the lowest
score.
2.a.The boy and the girl were different in such variables
as “Transformational leadership” and “Transactional
leadership”, also, the seventh, eighth, and
ninth grade students were significantly different
in “Transformational leadership” and “Transactional
leadership”; also, no significant difference
was founded in “Non-transaction leadership”.
b.The boy and girl were significantly different in such
factors as “Internal” and “External” motivation, and
boys got higher score than girls. As to
“Non-motivation”, no significant difference between
boys and girls was founded. Different grades students
were significantly different in “Motivation” factor.
3.“Transformational leadership” and “Transactional
leadership” were significantly positive correlation
in such factor as “Internal motivation” and “External
motivation”. “Transformational leadership” was
significantly negative correlation in “Non-
motivation”. “Transactional leadership” was not
significantly different in “Non-motivation”. “Non-
transactional leadership” was not significantly
different in “Internal motivation” and “External
motivation” factors, but in “Non-motivation”, positive
correlation
|
|---|
