A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators.

碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 100 === The regulation of insider trading in our country mainly focus on corporate insiders; however, corporate outsiders, there is no specific rules to apply. Although public servants and legislators are not corporate insiders, their positions are so sensitive that mak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Mei-ting, 029774507
Other Authors: 蔡昌憲
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24089575716787574261
id ndltd-TW-100NTHU5705009
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-100NTHU57050092015-10-13T21:06:55Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24089575716787574261 A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators. 從信賴義務論公司外部人之內線交易責任-以公務員及立法委員為中心 Chen, Mei-ting 029774507 碩士 國立清華大學 科技法律研究所 100 The regulation of insider trading in our country mainly focus on corporate insiders; however, corporate outsiders, there is no specific rules to apply. Although public servants and legislators are not corporate insiders, their positions are so sensitive that make them acquire material nonpublic information quite easily. As a result, it is truly necessary to figure out whether both of them are the subjects under the regulation of insider trading or not. However, there have been a regulation theory battle between “The Equal Access Theory” and “Classical Theory” (Misappropriation Theory included) in our country, and which theory as the basic ground of the regulation dose really matters in defining the subjects under the regulation. This paper asserts that Classical Theory should be applied as the fundamental ground of the insider trading regulation. The main reason is that the consequence of insider trading is involved with the crime penalty so that it should be much more prudent while interpreting this regulation, therefore, it is more appropriate to apply Classical Theory because of its narrow subject scope. In addition, fiduciary duty is a crucial and fundamental concept in jurisprudence, a key element in Classical Theory also. The reason that insiders violate the insider trading regulation is breach of the duty of loyalty, which is under the fiduciary duty. Even though corporate outsiders have no fiduciary duty to securities issued company, they are also under the scope of Classical Theory because of their fiduciary duty owed the information source. As a result, Classical Theory is the appropriate theory for insider trading regulation instead of the Equal Access Theory, and the problems raised by public servants and legislators also can be solved by the application of this theory, which is the main goal of this paper. 蔡昌憲 2012 學位論文 ; thesis 137 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 100 === The regulation of insider trading in our country mainly focus on corporate insiders; however, corporate outsiders, there is no specific rules to apply. Although public servants and legislators are not corporate insiders, their positions are so sensitive that make them acquire material nonpublic information quite easily. As a result, it is truly necessary to figure out whether both of them are the subjects under the regulation of insider trading or not. However, there have been a regulation theory battle between “The Equal Access Theory” and “Classical Theory” (Misappropriation Theory included) in our country, and which theory as the basic ground of the regulation dose really matters in defining the subjects under the regulation. This paper asserts that Classical Theory should be applied as the fundamental ground of the insider trading regulation. The main reason is that the consequence of insider trading is involved with the crime penalty so that it should be much more prudent while interpreting this regulation, therefore, it is more appropriate to apply Classical Theory because of its narrow subject scope. In addition, fiduciary duty is a crucial and fundamental concept in jurisprudence, a key element in Classical Theory also. The reason that insiders violate the insider trading regulation is breach of the duty of loyalty, which is under the fiduciary duty. Even though corporate outsiders have no fiduciary duty to securities issued company, they are also under the scope of Classical Theory because of their fiduciary duty owed the information source. As a result, Classical Theory is the appropriate theory for insider trading regulation instead of the Equal Access Theory, and the problems raised by public servants and legislators also can be solved by the application of this theory, which is the main goal of this paper.
author2 蔡昌憲
author_facet 蔡昌憲
Chen, Mei-ting
029774507
author Chen, Mei-ting
029774507
spellingShingle Chen, Mei-ting
029774507
A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators.
author_sort Chen, Mei-ting
title A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators.
title_short A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators.
title_full A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators.
title_fullStr A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators.
title_full_unstemmed A Study on the Liability of Corporate Outsider Trading from the Perspective of Fiduciary Duty: Focusing on Public Servants and Legislators.
title_sort study on the liability of corporate outsider trading from the perspective of fiduciary duty: focusing on public servants and legislators.
publishDate 2012
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24089575716787574261
work_keys_str_mv AT chenmeiting astudyontheliabilityofcorporateoutsidertradingfromtheperspectiveoffiduciarydutyfocusingonpublicservantsandlegislators
AT 029774507 astudyontheliabilityofcorporateoutsidertradingfromtheperspectiveoffiduciarydutyfocusingonpublicservantsandlegislators
AT chenmeiting cóngxìnlàiyìwùlùngōngsīwàibùrénzhīnèixiànjiāoyìzérènyǐgōngwùyuánjílìfǎwěiyuánwèizhōngxīn
AT 029774507 cóngxìnlàiyìwùlùngōngsīwàibùrénzhīnèixiànjiāoyìzérènyǐgōngwùyuánjílìfǎwěiyuánwèizhōngxīn
AT chenmeiting studyontheliabilityofcorporateoutsidertradingfromtheperspectiveoffiduciarydutyfocusingonpublicservantsandlegislators
AT 029774507 studyontheliabilityofcorporateoutsidertradingfromtheperspectiveoffiduciarydutyfocusingonpublicservantsandlegislators
_version_ 1718055504074244096