The Analysis of Passing Technology in Soccer Games –In Top 6 Finals in 2011 AFC President's Cup Games

碩士 === 國立臺灣體育運動大學 === 競技運動學系碩士班 === 100 ===   This thesis aims at examining the effects of passing slip, deprivation and interception skill in soccer competitions. Through observation of the recorded competition films, the times of deprivation, successful interception and passing slip were set down...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang Cheng-Tsung, 黃正宗
Other Authors: Chao Rong-Jui
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/7bh3fc
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣體育運動大學 === 競技運動學系碩士班 === 100 ===   This thesis aims at examining the effects of passing slip, deprivation and interception skill in soccer competitions. Through observation of the recorded competition films, the times of deprivation, successful interception and passing slip were set down and analyzed to conclude the competition mode of excellent teams. The SPSS program was used for statistical analysis, descriptive statistics and Paired t test to examine the difference of data between the first six teams of 2011 AFC President's Cup.The findings of the observation are as follow: (1) According to the data of 144 times deprivation, balls were scrambled in the midfield for the most times. (Longitude: midfield> attack field>defense field. Transverse: midfield> left field> right field) (2) The data of successful interception indicated that, in 407 times of intercepting successfully, balls were intercepted in the defense field most frequently. (Longitude: defense field> midfield> attack field. Transverse: midfield> right field> left field) It was more difficult for attackers to set the pace in this field; therefore, defenses were strengthened to avoid attackers approaching goal areas. (3) The data of passing slip shows that, in 504 times of slips, passing slips happened in the defense field for the most number of times. (Longitude: defense field> midfield> attack field. Transverse: midfield> right field> left field transversely) Attackers who came in the competitors’ defense field couldn’t concentrate enough on the competition or bear the stress would slip in the field. (4) The results of this study are as follow: 1. The differences of the data among the winners and the losers in deprivation, success interception and passing slip are not significant. 2. There is a significant difference in comparing passing slip of each match in midfield with a significant value of 0.008. 3. The verification of passing slip in second half of game and deprivation in left field represent that the difference is not significant since the SD score of the two groups is much more than the mean score.