| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 公共事務管理研究所 === 100 === The pan-green coalition’s perspectives towards development of Kaohsiung under cross-strait pattern are investigated in this disquisition. The gist of the study, that adopts Dr. Ming-shen Wang’s original PAM (Public Affairs Management) and SDM (Social Development Matrix) methods as a foundation of its theory, and that combines MOORE’s V.C.S. ( Value, Capacity, Support ) policy characterized in triangle interview issues, looks into whether the management and operation are available for Kaohsiung government’s communicating of cross-strait trades. After dealing with the pan-green opinions, by interviewing 55 persons who belong to pan-green and neutral constituencies, including delegates, scholars, media, public officials, all sorts of trades, and citizens, the conclusion appears their common believes and various values of their statements.
However, the conflict exists among the constituencies’ knowledge towards the development of Kaohsiung city under the cross-strait circumstance. For example, at the controversial film festival year when Rebiya Kadeer was displayed without being censored, there are convincing conflicts over it between public officials and citizens. In the official group, 100 percent reveals that in democratic Taiwan, it is unnecessary to be censored at all. Comparing the citizen group, 29.4 percent suggests that it is unnecessary either, 12.6 percent accounts for the fact that it related nothing to administrators’ abilities, 25.2 percent says that it needs censorship before displaying, 21 percent shows that it belongs to an ideological subject, 12 percent is miscellaneous. The final goal of two groups’ statistics proves the necessaries of the equally developments between northern Taiwan and the southern, draining foreign institutional investors into Kaohsiung, promoting its development of economy, increasing the opportunities of employment, stable living and people owning their houses, prosperity in all.
|
|---|
