Using AHP to Analyze Technology Development Program Performance Evaluation Indicator Weight and Priority –The Study of Non-profit R&D Organization

• Main Author: 林錦鶴
• Other Authors: Huimin Chung
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2012
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/83923535281623203605

碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 高階主管管理碩士學程 === 100 === This study, by analysis of the technology project performance assessment model, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to analyze the relationship between multi-criteria dimensions and assessment indicators, established a science and technology R & D evaluation model prototype for research units. The evaluation model, which is composed of four dimensions and twenty assessment indicators, is used for each study case and a questionnaire survey is conducted among corporate unit supervisors and project leaders at all levels. The study also investigates possible causes by the statistical analysis of weights and sorting from all dimensions and indicators in this model. The dimensions in order of importance are as follows: "Industrial Benefit", "Application “, “Output, “and “Achievement Diffusion.” The top five evaluation indicator weights in sequence are "Technology Transfer", " New Venture Creation ",” New product/New Service Development ", "Patent Application " and "Commissioned Industrial Service.” The research results provide institutions in this case 3 suggestions:1. The top 70% indicators of the survey result propose to be performance valuation indicators for research units；2.Gradually establish the internal performance evaluation mechanism.3.Yearly review each indicator of the performance evaluation mechanism, and adjust properly. This study can be served as a reference, for these cases in this study and other research organizations.