| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立體育大學 === 體育推廣學系碩士班 === 100 === This study focuses on our winning structure in the latest three Universiade Competitions from 2007 till 2011. Furthermore, it compares the differences between our country and other top three countries, and finally analyses our future winning possibilities. This study is written in literature analysis method and the result shows that our ranking is between 7 to 9 in the recent three Universiade Competitions, which means our strength of winning awards is basically stable. Twelve categories that aim to win the gold medals are: taekwondo, archery, table tennis, weightlifting, badminton, golf, track and field, tennis, shooting, gymnastics, softball, and women's basketball. Skills-oriented group is the most award-winning group. The most powerful among the group are net-separation antagonism, grapple antagonism, and accuracy. “Generally economical” has the highest proportion of award-winning. However, "the most economical" award-winning is the lowest. Therefore, training expense in our country is not accordance with economy to investment, lack of economic benefits. In Chinese Taipei, female players have greater advantage of winning gold than male players do. Among the top three countries, in skill classification of net-separation antagonism items group is the best. As for the winning medals, in Chinese Taipei, the women is better than men, which is quite unbalanced comparing with other countries. Chinese Taipei has continued development and the categories of winning awards are taekwondo, archery, table ball, tennis, feather ball, golf, nvlei, basketball (woman), weightlifting, men gymnastics (rings), men swimming (200 butterfly), Men's track , field (long jump, and shot put) and female Judo ( -63kg), a total of 14 species.
Keywords: Key Projects, Prize Structure, Universiade
|
|---|
